[SR-Users] Problems configuring Kamailio on Centos 6.5

2014-10-10 Thread logikanet
Good evening! I've been trying to install Kamailio on a Centos 6.5 cloud , I'm able to compile and install everything, if I run : service kamailio start it starts kamailio and if I run service kamailio status I tells me that is running on PID... which is fine, however, if I tweak the

Re: [SR-Users] 483 too many hops

2014-10-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, if you are using a domain in sip addresses, be sure you have alias=domain as global parameter in kamailio.cfg Cheers, Daniel On 10/10/14 09:27, Anil Kumar wrote: Hi All, I am trying to register an ims-client/user to kamailio proxy, but I am seeing 483 too many hops response. I

Re: [SR-Users] Fwd: presence module issue with NOTIFY messsage.

2014-10-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, if the presence server is first hop after a nat router, then use fix_natted_contact() for SUBSCRIBE requests instead of add/set_contact_alias(). Cheers, Daniel On 05/10/14 06:52, Thanh Truong wrote: Hi all, I have install kamailio 4.2 latest version with presence module. But I

Re: [SR-Users] Serial forking q value

2014-10-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, you can use sqlops to retrieve data from any database table, with the structure you want. Then with append_branch() function and $branch(...) variable, you have the options to add branches and update their specific attributes with the values retrieved from database. Cheers, Daniel

Re: [SR-Users] UAC call to ATT

2014-10-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, you have to provide the sip trace taken on kamailio (on both sides - caller and callee), to be able to see what really happens there. If an INVITE gets a CANCEL, then it is replied with 487 and the proxy has to send an ACK. Kamailio doesn't send ACK for a 200ok. Cheers, Daniel On

Re: [SR-Users] uri2dst: bad_uri

2014-10-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, apparently you have a broken r-uri ($ru) or dst uri ($du), which seems to be an address without leading 'sip:'. It could be because of config file operations, not parameters. Cheers, Daniel On 02/10/14 01:13, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote: Hello. We use 2 kamailio behind load balanser

Re: [SR-Users] cr_next_domain not found

2014-10-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
hello, check that the carrierroute module is loaded as well as cr_next_domain() has the appropriate number of parameters. Cheers, Daniel On 26/09/14 15:58, m...@brightvoip.co.uk wrote: Hi, I am trying to use the carrierfailureroute table functionality via the cr_next_domain carrierroute

Re: [SR-Users] 483 too many hops

2014-10-10 Thread Anil Kumar
Hi , Now 483 too many hops is resolved, thanks for that. But from server side 200 OK is missing for SUBSCRIBE, as well as NOTIFY. May I know the reason ? Thanks Anil On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, if you are using a domain in

Re: [SR-Users] Unconditional Call forwarding

2014-10-10 Thread Juha Heinanen
Now to simulate this i have gone through all the mail chains or tutorials and anything which is available on net but till now not able to simulate the scenario successfully. Here is the output of usr_preferences table. i know know about usr_preferences table, but once you have got the

Re: [SR-Users] Fwd: presence module issue with NOTIFY messsage.

2014-10-10 Thread Ovidiu Sas
I don't think this is documented anywhere and it's challenging for someone not familiar with kamailio to deal with it. Maybe we should open a bug report to make presence *_contact_alias friendly. -ovidiu On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] Fwd: presence module issue with NOTIFY messsage.

2014-10-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10/10/14 14:54, Ovidiu Sas wrote: I don't think this is documented anywhere and it's challenging for someone not familiar with kamailio to deal with it. Maybe we should open a bug report to make presence *_contact_alias friendly. add_contact_alias() is not going to be (very easy) friendly,

Re: [SR-Users] Fwd: presence module issue with NOTIFY messsage.

2014-10-10 Thread Ovidiu Sas
I would prefer to have add_contact_alias deprecated and then dropped (less confusing this way). -ovidiu On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/10/14 14:54, Ovidiu Sas wrote: I don't think this is documented anywhere and it's challenging for

[SR-Users] uac_from_replace does not restore when changing display name only

2014-10-10 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hi! It seems that uac_replace_from does restore the original URI only if the From URI is changed. Only changing the Display-name, eg: uac_replace_from($avp(pad),); does not add the RR-cookie, thus the original will not be restored (e.g. on responses). Is this on purpose or a bug?

Re: [SR-Users] uac_from_replace does not restore when changing display name only

2014-10-10 Thread Klaus Darilion
Further more, auto mode with restore_dlg=1 does automatically change the From-uri for in-dialog requests, but not the From-display name. Is this also intended? Thanks Klaus On 10.10.2014 16:02, Klaus Darilion wrote: Hi! It seems that uac_replace_from does restore the original URI only if

Re: [SR-Users] uri2dst: bad_uri

2014-10-10 Thread Yuriy Gorlichenko
Sorry for long answer. We added wrong proxy name at table. Resolved at ano day, just not saw your reply until today. Thanks 2014-10-10 13:25 GMT+04:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com: Hello, apparently you have a broken r-uri ($ru) or dst uri ($du), which seems to be an address

[SR-Users] Removing dispatcher entry

2014-10-10 Thread dodul
Hi, I have a small question. If I remove a server from my dispatcher while it has existing calls, what's gonna happen to the next notifications or requests of the live calls. Will it send them to the same server even though the server is not listed on the dispatcher. Or it will forward them

Re: [SR-Users] Removing dispatcher entry

2014-10-10 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi, the dispatcher module does not care about active calls when you remove a destination. The calls and all related SIP-Signalling will simply continue. This is handled by SIP-Loose Routing, not by the dispatcher module. The dispatcher module manages only the initial decision, what Server to

Re: [SR-Users] Removing dispatcher entry

2014-10-10 Thread Kamrul Khan
hi, thanks for your reply. so what you are saying is active calls will continue with the same server ? for example, lets say i have two entries in my dispatcher. 10.1.1.110.1.1.2 There are already 10 active calls between my Kamailio and 10.1.1.1 and i just removed 10.1.1.1 from dispatcher. So