hi,
i want to forward call from VITELITY to sip TWILIO , by using config file
(attached one) call gets connected but end automatically after 33 seconds.
i could find some miss configurations in sip packet flow with routing ACK (
attached .pcap ) .
Please suggest a solution .
-regards
Hello,
I'm currently using the $TS psuedovariable to get the current unix timestamp,
but this only returns the timestamp up to a second precision.
Is it possible in kamailio to get the current unix timestamp with milliseconds
precision?
Regards,
Grant
Hi,
I've got a dialog database table with lots of old entries; some several
months old. I'd like to remove them, but if there is a method that keeps
things synchronous and checks beyond DELETE FROM dialog WHERE
I'd like to use it.
Any pointers?
--
Måns Nilsson
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
the error message is what you printed from config and $du was not set.
If you want to troubleshoot better, set debug=3 in kamailio.cfg and watch
the log messages -- there will be plenty of them and
See http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.2.x/pseudovariables#tv_name
On 10/22/2014 10:40 AM, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
Hello,
I’m currently using the $TS psuedovariable to get the current unix
timestamp, but this only returns the timestamp up to a second precision.
Is it possible
Hi Daniel,
do you have any updates for me and what we can do to stop this messages?
Cheers
Kay
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Kay Montag
--
avodaq AG, Landsberger Str. 290, D-80687 München
Tel.: +49.1803.78 63 78, E-Mail: serv...@avodaq.com
First European Cisco Master Unified Communications. Cisco
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sadique Ali spalikk...@gmail.com
Date: 21 October 2014 18:55
Subject: ACK not forwarding properly
To: sr-users...@lists.sip-router.org
hi,
i want to forward call from VITELITY to sip TWILIO , by using config file
(attached one) call gets connected
Hi,
I'm looking for a mechanism to unregister clients when the corresponding
TCP connection is closed, but had no success so far.
I've tried the handle_lost_tcp parameter of usrloc, but it didn't work:
the user was not unregistered, whereas the connection was seen as
closed by kamailio. Is it
Awesome! Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Pogrebennyk
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:02 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Unix timestamp with
Well, in websocket module you have the event route that's triggered when a
connection is lost [1].
You wouldn't be able to use the unregister function of the registrar
module, because a faked SIP message is used to trigger the event, but you
can always write a custom SQL to delete the record of
Hi Sebastian,
On 22/10/14 08:36, Sebastian Damm wrote:
Hi Daniel,
thanks for the explanation and blog post. However, this is a different
approach than the asynchronous sqlops function, right? In sqlops, the
request is sent to an asynchronous worker in Kamailio and does the SQL
operation
Hello,
On 22/10/14 15:08, Camille Oudot wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a mechanism to unregister clients when the corresponding
TCP connection is closed, but had no success so far.
I've tried the handle_lost_tcp parameter of usrloc, but it didn't work:
the user was not unregistered, whereas
Hi
I didn't get any responses from anyone regarding my issue. Can someone please
give me some clue what I can do? Or if more information is needed please let
know so that I can provide.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
Original message
From: Kamrul Khan
Hi Dionlar,
can you elaborate the Memory issue a little bit more?
Can you also send me more information, on what OS and what
Kamailio-Version you are using? What configuration are you using?
If you have a memory issue, feel free to contact
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org, they should be able to
Please check ICE server settings. Your browser may be publishing local IP. One
way voice or no voice is typical case when client is behind firewall.
Regards,
Amit Patkar
dodul do...@live.com wrote:
Hi
I didn't get any responses from anyone regarding my issue. Can someone please
give me some
Le Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:12:12 +0200,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com a écrit :
it should work -- quickly looked to the code and couldn't spot a
problem. Just be aware that is working only when usrloc keeps the
records in memory (not designed for db only mode).
Ok, i'm using in
Le Wed, 22 Oct 2014 09:02:01 -0500,
Carlos Ruiz Díaz carlos.ruizd...@gmail.com a écrit :
You wouldn't be able to use the unregister function of the registrar
module, because a faked SIP message is used to trigger the event, but
you can always write a custom SQL to delete the record of the
Hi,
What is the practical limit to the number of async worker processes?
With SIP child processes, it seems to be about the number of available
CPUs in /proc/cpuinfo. After that--at least, per my testing--one begins
to hit the point of diminishing returns, presumably due to SHM IPC and
Also, what is the point of core async_workers setting versus the
'workers' modparam to async? Are they supposed to equal each other? Does
one override the other?
On 10/22/2014 09:36 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Hi,
What is the practical limit to the number of async worker processes?
With SIP
19 matches
Mail list logo
