Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy

2014-12-03 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the patch you pasted doesn't seem to be to nathelper module. Be sure you get the one from core as well. Cheers, Daniel On 02/12/14 18:44, Igor Potjevlesch wrote: Hello, Yes, second option. Here is the diff between current module and the original one: 823c823

Re: [SR-Users] PSTN Routing with Prefix

2014-12-03 Thread Abdul Gafar
Hi No posible, please use append_branch() and seturi( sip:08121069941@10.70.1.1:5060); for forward call UACKAMAILIO AMSCMobile Subscriber # if someone calls B, the call should be forwarded to C too. if (method==INVITE uri=~sip:b...@xx.xxx.xx ) { # copy the current

[SR-Users] Charging System

2014-12-03 Thread Abdul Gafar
Hi all I'm trying install IMS charging module,is this posible use kamailio server, without install other module IMS ? //Gafar ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org

[SR-Users] Refreshing the Kamailio logo

2014-12-03 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I was considering to discuss the state of Kamailio project logo for a while. The current state is ambiguous, to say at least - various logos in different places. When OpenSER was renamed in Kamailio we were trying to get something new, but due to the 'forks and dark waters' at that time,

[SR-Users] Accounting: syslog vs db_flatfile

2014-12-03 Thread DanB
Hey Guys, We are in the process to review the interoperability between Kamailio and CGRateS and was wondering what is the best/most recommended/maintained way to generate accounting from Kamailio: * Syslog * db_flatfile * other way maybe? Is CDR generation planned for files already, or

Re: [SR-Users] PSTN Routing with Prefix

2014-12-03 Thread Alex Balashov
Hi, No, rewritehostport() only touches the domain part of the Request URI (the part after the @ symbol, in a typical URI). So, it can accomplish the first part of your request, but not the second. That said, the rewritehostport() function is rather antiquated. It's much easier to manipulate

Re: [SR-Users] Accounting: syslog vs db_flatfile

2014-12-03 Thread Alex Balashov
Kamailio has a canonical 'acc' module. But as to the best way to generate accounting, you can do it any way you like. These are a thousand ways to do it, all boiling down to log call setup, process, failure, answer and teardown events somewhere. On 3 December 2014 05:30:45 GMT-05:00, DanB

Re: [SR-Users] PSTN Routing with Prefix

2014-12-03 Thread Massimo Varriale (IPZeta)
Thank you so much for giving me a direction! I will leave rewritehost and will make appropriate changes in my routing. Thanks Max Il giorno 03/dic/2014, alle ore 11:53, Alex Balashov ha scritto: Hi, No, rewritehostport() only touches the domain part of the Request URI (the part after

Re: [SR-Users] Accounting: syslog vs db_flatfile

2014-12-03 Thread Jordan Rinke
Why not just use the acc module for CDR generation and tie CGRateS into the same mysql db storing the generated CDR from kamailio? Looking at the docs it seems CGRateS uses that as it's default CDR store for rating anyways? https://github.com/cgrates/cgrates/tree/master/data/storage/mysql - a lot

Re: [SR-Users] Accounting: syslog vs db_flatfile

2014-12-03 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 03/12/14 11:30, DanB wrote: Hey Guys, We are in the process to review the interoperability between Kamailio and CGRateS and was wondering what is the best/most recommended/maintained way to generate accounting from Kamailio: * Syslog * db_flatfile * other way maybe?

Re: [SR-Users] Accounting: syslog vs db_flatfile

2014-12-03 Thread DanB
Hey Alex, Thank you for your quick answer. I understand what you mean regarding multiple ways of handling accounting. I was hoping about recommendation about best practice, most automated, most used, most maintained one (eg: development of CDR generation going towards syslog and such). For

Re: [SR-Users] Accounting: syslog vs db_flatfile

2014-12-03 Thread DanB
Btw, my preference was db_flatfile due to it's isolation from the rest of the system, however I don't see steps towards it, so prefer to go with most maintained way. Cheers, DanB On 03.12.2014 12:24, DanB wrote: Hey Alex, Thank you for your quick answer. I understand what you mean

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with 4.2.0 and nathelper and/or rtpproxy

2014-12-03 Thread Igor Potjevlesch
Hello Daniel, You're right. I patched nat_traversal… Sorry. I applied the patch on nathelper and msg_translator. It works fine now, thank you! You will port the patch into 4.2.2? Regards, Igor. De : Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 3