Re: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine

2016-05-06 Thread Alex Balashov
‎It's just a description of stateful behaviour in relation to the SDP offer-answer cycle. ‎ -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: 

Re: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine

2016-05-06 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 05/06/2016 07:36 AM, Dmitry wrote: > hello > > i read the documentation about RTPengine. > and the documentation says that: > > If INVITE with SDP, when the tm module is loaded, mark transaction with > internal flag FL_SDP_BODY to know that the 1xx and 2xx are for > rtpengine_answer() > >

[SR-Users] LCR Module Question

2016-05-06 Thread Juha Heinanen
Alberto Sagredo writes: > > I do not know if its enough to add under same lcr_id or its better to add > with different one and add several lcr_rule and lcr_rule_target > > Acordding to next_gw() function, what is better to be used? In my case. a > primary providers is used and only a backup one

[SR-Users] question about RTPengine

2016-05-06 Thread Dmitry
hello i read the documentation about RTPengine.and the documentation says that:  If INVITE with SDP, when the tm module is loaded, mark transaction with internal flag FL_SDP_BODY to know that the 1xx and 2xx are for rtpengine_answer() what does it mean?  actually - according to 3261 RTP media

Re: [SR-Users] LCR Module Question

2016-05-06 Thread Fred Posner
Have you considered either dispatcher or just using a failure route? -- Fred > On May 6, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Alberto Sagredo > wrote: > > Hi > > I have it working but i have re-read documentation and do not see how to do > what i need. > > I explain it :) > >

[SR-Users] LCR Module Question

2016-05-06 Thread Alberto Sagredo
Hi I have it working but i have re-read documentation and do not see how to do what i need. I explain it :) Now i have only one LCR provider and i need to add a backup one. I do not know if its enough to add under same lcr_id or its better to add with different one and add several lcr_rule and

Re: [SR-Users] User offline

2016-05-06 Thread ycaner
hello;     you can start rtpproxy like "rtpproxy -l 120.76.118.128 -s udp:127.0.0.1:7722 -F -m 1 -M 2 -d DBUG:LOG_DAEMON"  and check message log. After authantication ,  test only INVITE packets with nat_uac_client(8) , rtpproxy_manage can

Re: [SR-Users] User offline

2016-05-06 Thread 王欣鑫
Hello ycaner! I download rtpproxy-2.0-RC1.tar.gz from https://github.com/winer632/rtpproxy/releases/tag/V2.0-RC1 and did the following command: tar -xzvf rtpproxy-2.0-RC1.tar.gz cd rtpproxy-2.0-RC1 ./configure make all make install Then I start rtpproxy with this command: rtpproxy -l

Re: [SR-Users] Clients are busy

2016-05-06 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 07:13:19AM +, kai.ohnac...@cbc.de wrote: > in my scenario works multiple user with the kamailio server and uses > different clients. They work in a mobile scenario and setup the > clients and break the clients in a high period. If they break the > clients, sometimes

Re: [SR-Users] User offline

2016-05-06 Thread 王欣鑫
Hello ycaner! Thank you very much! Now, what I think is maybe I should setup a rtpproxy server first, and then modify some configuration in pcscf.cfg and kamailio.cfg. But I will do a study into the reference you give me first. -- View this message in context:

[SR-Users] Clients are busy

2016-05-06 Thread kai.ohnacker
Hello Community, in my scenario works multiple user with the kamailio server and uses different clients. They work in a mobile scenario and setup the clients and break the clients in a high period. If they break the clients, sometimes they don't send a bye, but they take off the cable

Re: [SR-Users] User offline

2016-05-06 Thread ycaner
Hello; you can use rtpproxy or rtpengine. you need to search how to use on google. rtpproxy/rtpengine fixes sdp packets that has tons of flags and there is a lot of option on sdpops module to change it. for example; you can check with nat_uac_client(8)

Re: [SR-Users] User offline

2016-05-06 Thread 王欣鑫
Hello,ycaner! Now I use a real IMS user data to register this user(for example 18616278715) to China Unicom's IMS through kamailio. I can register successsfully, and can make call using this number, the callee can pick up phone. However neither party can hear counter part. So, this should

Re: [SR-Users] User offline

2016-05-06 Thread 王欣鑫
Hello,ycaner! Now I use a real IMS user data to register this user(for example 18616278715) to China Unicom's IMS through kamailio. I can register successsfully, and can make call using this number, the callee can pick up phone. However neither party can hear counter part. So, this should be

Re: [SR-Users] User offline

2016-05-06 Thread 王欣鑫
Hello ycaner! I did as you told me and finally it worked! Here are my finall config files. hss_config.zip kamailio.zip Thank you very much!!! -- View

Re: [SR-Users] User offline

2016-05-06 Thread ycaner
Hello; at registration route , you can use nat traversal function , there is a sample on kamailio.cfg that parameter is just adding from and request header for information on OPTIONS packet. you can add your 120.XXX.XXX.XXX Cheers.

Re: [SR-Users] User offline

2016-05-06 Thread 王欣鑫
Hello,ycaner! Thanks for your advice! I searched nat_traversal in kamailio.cfg in PCSCF module, and found that I should define WITH_NATPING. After doing this, a new problem came. What does this line mean? What should I configure to replace "sip:keepalive@HOSTNAME" ? Is this HOSTNAME a turn/stun