Hello
Carrier route module doesnt have RPC command., we need to add it
Cheers.
--
View this message in context:
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/VERY-IMPORTANT-deciding-when-to-remove-the-MI-code-tp153719p153773.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Daniel,
I can see when people are using curl they can define content-type ;
--header 'Content-Type: application/json'
However is this possible within the jsonrpc_exec command, as this seems to set
the body.
Can you define the Content-Type before firing the command?
Thanks
Jon
On 02/12/2016 11:21, Alex Hermann wrote:
> On donderdag 1 december 2016 15:17:18 CET Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> RPC is the alternative, a more standardized
>> concept, with better structured format.
> Before removing MI and letting everyone move to RPC, it might be wise to go
> over all
On donderdag 1 december 2016 15:17:18 CET Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> RPC is the alternative, a more standardized
> concept, with better structured format.
Before removing MI and letting everyone move to RPC, it might be wise to go
over all RPC interfaces and fix them to be neat , sane and
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> Can you find that discussion in the archive? Open an item on bug tracker
> and add the link to the discussion there, so we don't forget about it.
Done, Juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
Hello,
On 02/12/2016 03:40, Colin Morelli wrote:
> Hey all, Sorry for two questions out at the same time! I'm using
> kamailio in front of FS, and I'm about to enable IPv6, but I have a
> question that I'm not entirely clear on. What's the proper way to
> forward traffic using the same interface
On 02/12/2016 00:24, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Brandon Armstead writes:
>
>> +1 - I'm all for cleaning up any technical debt and moving on with more
>> normalized concept.
> I'm also in favor of getting rid on MI interface. I'm myself relying
> only on one MI command (pua_publish) for which an RPC
