using
the nat_uac_test("19") and fix_nated_contact(), but I'm unsure if this is
good practice or not.
Kind regards,
Luke
On 4 August 2016 at 07:10, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks again for your reply again.
>
> I rememb
ly
for core and rr modules to 3.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/08/16 13:22, Luke Milbourne wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I've added some more logging and can see loose_route() is returning -1 -
route calculation has been unsuccessful.
Is there a way of finding out why this is the case?
Kind regards,
Luke
On 2
Hi Daniel,
I've added some more logging and can see loose_route() is returning -1 -
route calculation has been unsuccessful.
Is there a way of finding out why this is the case?
Kind regards,
Luke
On 2 August 2016 at 09:49, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I added
I added the below xlog lines into my script:
xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before loose_route: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
xlog("L_NOTICE", "Before record_route: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
xlog("L_NOTICE", "After both: $si -> $ru - $du\n");
Which generated the below output in syslog:
Aug 2 09:46:11 ip-10-10-2-5
version of Kamailio are you using?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 01/08/16 14:46, Luke Milbourne wrote:
>
> Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?
>
> On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbou...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
much appreciated, but I'll
continue going through the config line by line.
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:46, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?
>
> On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbour
Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?
On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
>
> modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
>
> Kin
Hi Daniel,
Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
Kind regards,
Luke
On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
>
> Hi
_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbou...@gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbou.
Hi Fred,
Thanks for your response.
Still getting to grips with Kamailio but so far so good.
Kind regards,
Luke
On 2 December 2015 at 18:07, Fred Posner <f...@palner.com> wrote:
> On 12/02/2015 06:22 AM, Luke Milbourne wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I need t
and then disconnecting
each time.
If I use SQLOPS, does this mean Kamailio will keep a connection available
to the DB?
--
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbou...@gmail.com>
Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbou...@gmail.com
___
SIP Express Route
11 matches
Mail list logo
