Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-18 Thread Thomas Baumann
for response. - Show quoted text - On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:59 PM, marius zbihlei marius.zbih...@1and1.ro wrote: On 02/16/2011 04:47 PM, Thomas Baumann wrote: Hello Marius, thanks a lot for submitting the patch. It works like a charm now. But to be honest I had troubles to find

Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Baumann
Hello Marius, thanks a lot for submitting the patch. It works like a charm now. But to be honest I had troubles to find this patch, I just checked the daily tarball http://sip-router.org/tarballs/sr/ and found this change.How I can get patch e914f97b4 in a better way ?regards,ThomasHelloI have

Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-16 Thread Thomas Baumann
Hello Marius, thanks a lot for submitting the patch. It works like a charm now. But to be honest I had troubles to find this patch, I just checked the daily tarball [http://sip-router.org/tarballs/sr/] and found this change. How I can get patch e914f97b4 in a better way ? regards, Thomas

Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-15 Thread Thomas Baumann
: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts On Wednesday 09 February 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote: I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2 instances of PDB Server runs on (10.12.19.51/10001/10002), Kamailio on (10.12.19.21). With a small amount of traffic (-cmax 150 -cps 10

Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-11 Thread Thomas Baumann
Westerholt henning.westerh...@1und1.de Gesendet: 11.02.2011 09:33:05 An: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts On Wednesday 09 February 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote: I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2 instances of PDB Server runs

[SR-Users] pdb module timeouts

2011-02-09 Thread Thomas Baumann
Hello, I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2 instances of PDB Server runs on (10.12.19.51/10001/10002), Kamailio on (10.12.19.21). With a small amount of traffic (-cmax 150 -cps 10 -callduration 3), where are timeouts: WARNING: pdb [pdb.c:260]: exceeded

Re: [SR-Users] dispatcher - ds_mark_dst(i); is inactive only few seconds

2011-02-04 Thread Thomas Baumann
: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Gesendet: 03.02.2011 21:38:49 An: Thomas Baumann Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] dispatcher - ds_mark_dst(i); is inactive only few seconds Hello, On 2/3/11 7:07 PM, Thomas Baumann wrote: Hi Daniel, thanks for the hints, with debug_level they are some hints what happened

Re: [SR-Users] dispatcher - ds_mark_dst(i); is inactive only few seconds

2011-02-03 Thread Thomas Baumann
Hi Daniel, thanks for the hints,  with debug_level they are some hints what happened. Normal Operation: 5(20410) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2305]: probing set #1, URI sip:10.12.19.31:5060 5(20410) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2305]: probing set #1, URI sip:10.12.19.21:5060 4(20409) DEBUG: