2010/6/22 Alex Balashov :
>> If such REGISTER contains a Record-Route it means that a proxy has
>> added it so the registrar (UAS) MUST mirror "Record-Route" in the 200
>> response. This is what RFC 3261 states, why do you think it's wrong??
>
> I would think his objection would be based on the fac
On 06/22/2010 04:39 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/6/22 Xiaoqiang Hu:
Hi all,
A Record-Route header field exists in 200 OK from openser register server after
sending a REGISTER request with a Record-Route header field. The details can be
as follows:
If such REGISTER contains a Record-Rou
2010/6/22 Xiaoqiang Hu :
> Hi all,
> A Record-Route header field exists in 200 OK from openser register server
> after sending a REGISTER request with a Record-Route header field. The
> details can be as follows:
If such REGISTER contains a Record-Route it means that a proxy has
added it so the
Hi all,
A Record-Route header field exists in 200 OK from openser register server after
sending a REGISTER request with a Record-Route header field. The details can be
as follows:
1 Test topology:
NUT(REG && PX) UA11 UA12
