Re: [SR-Users] High availability

accessing the very same database? Please consider that in a MySQL cluster only one client at time has permission to write the same record. Cheers! Moacir From: chabert.loic...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 09:45:15 +0200 To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability Hi Mo

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

uld behave if I have one active Kamailio writing in > the database and a second "live" Kamailio using the same database but not > receiving any connection/request. Would this jeopardize the way Kamailio > works? > > Cheers, > Moacir > > --

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

Cheers, Moacir To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org From: mico...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:01:23 +0200 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability Just to mention that ucarp can be a very basic alternative to corosync/pacemaker to manage the virtual ip. A simple app, b

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

ata the active Kamailio had, to this new Kamailio instance >> would be enough to allow it find the called party? >> >> Anyway, can you guys comment on my "thoughts"? Is it possible? Am I >> missing something? Would you suggest another approach for such scenario? &g

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

Hello, a bit curious about this one ... Are you in control at low level of the infrastructure (e.g., leased pipes between data centers)? I expect that is needed to change the routes for IP addresses in real time ... Cheers, Daniel On 05/06/16 21:07, Loic Chabert wrote: > > Hello Bill, > > I

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

g something? Would you suggest another approach for such scenario? Cheers! Moacir Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:07:41 +0200 From: chabert.loic...@gmail.com<mailto:chabert.loic...@gmail.com> To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> Subj

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

> > > > - Original Message - > > *From:* Moacir Ferreira <moacirferre...@hotmail.com> > *To:* Kamailio Mail List <sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> > *Sent:* Sunday, June 05, 2016 10:26 PM > *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] High availability > > Hi, > > Sorry

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

- Original Message - From: Moacir Ferreira To: Kamailio Mail List Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 10:26 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability Hi, Sorry... I should have mentioned before. You guys are thinking on the standard Internet SIP calls' behavior while I am trying

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

Fred Posner writes: > If it's just 2 servers, consider as Juha said, corosync/pacemaker with > drbd. Yes, and if you prefer to use mysql master-master replication instead of drbd, you can still use corosync/pacemaker for active/passive kamailio sip proxy that share the same virtual ip address.

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

would be > enough to allow it find the called party? > > Anyway, can you guys comment on my "thoughts"? Is it possible? Am I > missing something? Would you suggest another approach for such scenario? > > Cheers! > Moacir > >

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

find the called party? > > Anyway, can you guys comment on my "thoughts"? Is it possible? Am I missing > something? Would you suggest another approach for such scenario? > > Cheers! > Moacir > > Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:07:41 +0200 > From: chabert.loic...@gmai

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

? Am I missing something? Would you suggest another approach for such scenario? Cheers! Moacir Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:07:41 +0200 From: chabert.loic...@gmail.com To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability Hello Bill, I have made kamailio ha using exabgp with l

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

Hello Bill, I have made kamailio ha using exabgp with loopbacks. Check https://github.com/Exa-Networks/exabgp With bgp, kamailio cluster can be splited on severals datacenters. Regards. Le 5 juin 2016 20:53, "Bill" a écrit : > Hi Moacir > > We have only found three ways to

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

Hi Moacir We have only found three ways to handle failover. 1. Change the DNS entry whenever a failure is detected. 2. Use SRV records to display an alternate route. 3. Use the failover mechanism in the phone itself 1. works, but it may take some time for your ua's to become aware of the

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

Hi Moacir We have only found three ways to handle failover. 1. Change the DNS entry whenever a failure is detected. 2. Use SRV records to display an alternate route. 3. Use the failover mechanism in the phone itself 1. works, but it may take some time for your ua's to become aware of the

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

HI Moacir 1.- Take a look to keepalived.org 2.- LCR Module or dispatcher could do what you look for Best Regards 2016-06-05 16:41 GMT+02:00 Moacir Ferreira : > Hi, > > I got two questions regarding high availability: > > 1 - Should my Kamailio server fail, I would

[SR-Users] High availability

Hi, What would be the community's architecture advice for deploying Kamailio in a high availability environment? I am looking for something simple, still efficient. Thanks, ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

Use multiple kamailio's, access them over sip-srv (that will give you high availability) , and checkout cassandra if you need db-connectivity ;) That should be imho the simplest and oh boy efficient :) On 12 Mar 2013, at 10:29, Moacir Ferreira wrote: Hi, What would be the community's

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

? Just by having access to the same SQL database will server B be able to call (locate) a client that was registered initially on server A? Thanks, MoacirFrom: davy.van.de.mo...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:34:58 +0100 To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High

Re: [SR-Users] High availability

[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Moacir Ferreira Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 2:36 PM To: Kamailio Mail List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High availability The limitation is when the client phone is not srv aware. But anyway, for sure this would be the best solution. So, if I

Re: [SR-Users] High availability design with Kamailio

Hi again, Some progress.. I have configured heartbeat and with the crm option to set kamailio as resource i.e crm(test-conf)configure# *primitive Kamailio lsb::kamailio op monitor interval=15s* I can see that if I put the primary node on standby the kamailio instance starts on secondary node !

Re: [SR-Users] High availability design with Kamailio

Infact if kamailio goes down heartbeat restarts it again !! how do I stop heartbeat doing it and let the other node take over the resource! On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:05 PM, SamyGo govoi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi again, Some progress.. I have configured heartbeat and with the crm option to set

Re: [SR-Users] High availability design with Kamailio

Hello, the wiki is open for everyone to contribute: * http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/ You need to make yourself an account, the anonymous posting based on CAPTCHA was disabled due to spam bots easily breaking CAPTCHA system and posting spam. If someone takes the time to search a bit through

Re: [SR-Users] High availability design with Kamailio

Sir , I always do a thorough searching through the user's mailing list here., and I know I still find it difficult thinking about creating a cluster of Kamailio servers. If only there could be basic instructions and specially role of new version modules(may be *dmq*) to create a telco-grade

Re: [SR-Users] High availability design with Kamailio

SamyGo writes: Thats just my suggestion, I am trying to setup a clustered service and still no luck. Only heartbeat works which is pretty basic, anything on top of heartbeat to make it application level redundant (active/passive OR active/active) like OCF resources and their documentation is

Re: [SR-Users] High availability design with Kamailio

Thanks Juha :) Really appreciate that. Would you please like to contribute the whole procedure so that everyone knows whats happening here !! As soon as I finish with this one *successfully* I will write about it in my blog, so anything that leads to its successful implementation would benefit

Re: [SR-Users] High availability design with Kamailio

SamyGo writes: Really appreciate that. Would you please like to contribute the whole procedure so that everyone knows whats happening here !! i'm not able write a tutorial on how to setup and use heartbeat/pacemaker. virtual-ip and sip-proxy could be configured something like this (i haven't

[SR-Users] High availability design with Kamailio

Dear all, hope to get some information from you guys! For a redundant service we have to build up SIP proxy/registrar server in a high available scenario. Therefore, we will have 2 SIP proxy/registrar on two completely independent servers. They should be SIP dialog stateful and replicate all

Re: [SR-Users] High Availability for ongoing calls

Yeah, I'm using OpenSIPS. I've be searching for this exhaustively for the last week in all OpenSIPS docs and development lists I could find in the OpenSIPS website and on the Internet, and also a bunch of HA projects related to SIP servers in general (not related to OpenSIPS or Kamailio) which