Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways

2011-09-07 Thread Sarat C. Vemuri
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways It seems that something is miss configured on your server. The fixes that I made in the trunk (and you pulled in your local 3.1 repo) were designed to handle the scenario that you are trying to implement. The ACK should

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways

2011-09-07 Thread Ovidiu Sas
[mailto:o...@voipembedded.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:50 AM To: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways It seems that something is miss configured on your server

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways

2011-09-05 Thread Sarat C. Vemuri
to Ovidiu as well with some more details. Thanks SV. -- Message: 2 Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:12:38 -0400 From: Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways - some via Firewall/NAT To: sr

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways

2011-09-05 Thread Alex Balashov
On 09/05/2011 08:07 PM, Sarat C. Vemuri wrote: How do I remove the public IP entry from the route set before forwarding the reply to Internal UAC? You don't -- at least, not in a protocol-compliant way. You can, of course, do remove_hf(Route); if you want to, but with effects that are

[SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways - some via Firewall/NAT

2011-09-03 Thread Sarat C. Vemuri
We are trying to configure Kamailio (3.1.x) as a boarder proxy where it acts as the front for various carrier gateways so that internal UACs and UASs are unaware of the carrier gateways. Let me try to present a clear picture of our setup. 1. Kamailio has several NICs (physical or vlan).

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways - some via Firewall/NAT

2011-09-03 Thread Alex Balashov
On 09/03/2011 05:53 PM, Sarat C. Vemuri wrote: 3.Using request_route_preset(“publicIP”) The above “mostly” works. By that I mean, the INVITE transaction is properly passed between internal UAS and carrier SBC and the call is setup. However, further transactions (BYE/re-INVITE) etc do not work