Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

On 23/02/16 05:20, Arsen Hovhanissian wrote: > Sorry forgot to specify (in-memory) not using the DB, I feel like using the > DB for such a task would be such a drag on it > The dialog profile items replication should be possible, but full dialog state in-memory replication would result also in

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Sorry forgot to specify (in-memory) not using the DB, I feel like using the DB for such a task would be such a drag on it ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Since this thread is open, I wanted to ask, is it possible to replicate dialog data over to multiple nodes as well? ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:17:41AM +0100, Federico Cabiddu wrote: > a solution in this case could be making usage of Path header ( > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3327). > You have to load the path module > http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/path.html > and enabled its usage in

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 01:48:50PM +0330, Gholamreza Sabery wrote: > Actually I think something is not clear here. Suppose I want to use two > Kamailio servers such that a client which is registered on server A is able > to call another client registered on server B. In this case I use DB_MODE >

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Actually I think something is not clear here. Suppose I want to use two Kamailio servers such that a client which is registered on server A is able to call another client registered on server B. In this case I use DB_MODE 3. Both servers have access to location database but sockets are non-local

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Hi, If you have following: UA A > Kamilio 1 UA B > Kamailio 2 With path you just make sure that all calls are routed to that server where UA initially registered. So if UA A is calling UA B, call will go in such way: UA A=> Kamilio 1 => Kamailio 2 => UA B. I hope I answered your

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Hi, Interesting discussion going on. Ive to ask can OP use shared location table between different kamailio servers and use db mode 3. All he has to do is if UA B calls UA A via Kamailio2 he just needs to find the received socket and if it is not local Kamailio2 then route to the IP maybe attach a

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

On 02/01/2016 02:59 AM, Jurijs Ivolga wrote: I think you need to make record routing, so it will keep initial(to what user registered) Kamailio in signaling path. Ah, no. Record-Route is for INVITEs only. You're thinking of Path. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Hi, a solution in this case could be making usage of Path header ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3327). You have to load the path module http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/path.html and enabled its usage in registrar module

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Yes I want to distribute my users across multiple Kamailio servers. It seems a good idea than you Alex I will try it! On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: > Here's a thought, though: > > If your goal is really for users registered on one server to be

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Hi, I think you need to make record routing, so it will keep initial(to what user registered) Kamailio in signaling path. I hope it will helps. With kind regards, Jurijs 2016-02-01 9:33 GMT+02:00 Gholamreza Sabery : > Thank you so much Alex. I tried REGISTER replication

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Hi Alex, You are right. :) With kind regards, 2016-02-01 10:09 GMT+02:00 Alex Balashov : > On 02/01/2016 02:59 AM, Jurijs Ivolga wrote: > > I think you need to make record routing, so it will keep initial(to what >> user registered) Kamailio in signaling path. >> > >

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

All right. Thank you so much. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Federico Cabiddu < federico.cabi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > a solution in this case could be making usage of Path header ( > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3327). > > You have to load the path module > >

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Also one of the most siplies ways to resolve your issue is using queries at the databases that select needed fields from db with (where socket=""). 2016-02-01 11:43 GMT+03:00 Gholamreza Sabery : > All right. Thank you so much. > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Federico

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

The solution I am using is to have each Kamailio servers read subscriber/location data from a local database server. Each of these local databases is replicated from a Master database. We have db_mode=3 for sqlops, so it's always reading from the database to identify the user/phone. -H On

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

hi Gholamreza Sabery you should be implement HA on your server.you can use the pacemaker/corosync or other software for run and configuration HA on your server. On 1/31/16, Gholamreza Sabery wrote: > I am trying to create a cluster of Kamailio servers. I want users that are

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Dear Hossein; I know about Corosync and Pacemaker and I implemented something using these tools with Ansible ( https://github.com/ghrst/Kamailio-HA). But my question here is about active-active scenarios not an active-passive one! On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Hossein Aghaie

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Thank you so much Alex. I tried REGISTER replication and DM_MODE 3. But my problem here is that in these scenarios Kamailio will give you a non-local socket error. I want to have multiple Kamailio servers so that a user that is registered on one server can easily call other users on another

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

On 02/01/2016 02:33 AM, Gholamreza Sabery wrote: in these scenarios Kamailio will give you a non-local socket error It's a warning, not an error. Right? I don't remember how we solved that... -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta,

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Hi Gholamreza, Most Kamailio functionality can be used in an active-active way as long as there is a database persistence layer that can be shared among them: In particular, since you asked about the registrar: you can use `db_mode` 3 with `usrloc` to achieve this persistence:

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Although, the core `dmq` module is a big help in providing a distribution vehicle for messaging you do wish to replicate into a 'cluster': http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/dmq.html#dmq.f.dmq_t_replicate -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

Here's a thought, though: If your goal is really for users registered on one server to be able to easily call users registered on another server, you probably don't care to replicate or share the 'location' table per se. You just want one Kamailio server to call the right Kamailio server to

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

I have something similar and I use the following architecture: NGCP-A-subscribres A||sip trunk between A and B ||NGCP-B-subscribers B ||sip trunk between B and C |NGCP-C-Subscribers C ||sip trunk between A and C

[SR-Users] Kamailio Cluster

I am trying to create a cluster of Kamailio servers. I want users that are registered on one server to be able to contact and call users on other servers. How can I implement this in Kamailio? PS: My servers are in a private network and I do not have DNS.