I'm not suggesting that t_next_contacts deviates from the README. I'm
looking for its specific use case when combined with the outbound module.
At the very least, the example registrar configuration here:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.4.x/modules/outbound.html is
incomplete, in that it wil
Colin Morelli writes:
> When there's one registration binding in the locations table,
> t_load_contacts doesn't seem to do anything and as a result
> t_next_contacts fails.
t_next_contacts() does work as specified in README:
Function returns 1 if contacts_avp was not empty and a destination se
Juha,
I changed the message between when I copied the code and the logs. Those
lines are the lines that produce the error message.
As I mentioned in the original message - I'm aware that there's only one
branch in the set. That is the case that this doesn't work. When there's
one registration bin
Colin Morelli writes:
> 8(27) DEBUG: tm [t_serial.c:191]: t_load_contacts(): nr_branches is 0
> 8(27) DEBUG: tm [t_serial.c:194]: t_load_contacts(): nothing to do - only
> one contact!
> 8(27) DEBUG: tm [t_serial.c:455]: t_next_contacts(): no contacts in
> contacts_avp - we are done!
> 8(27) E
Hey all,
I've got two layers of Kamailio proxies running. One set of edge proxies
that are parking outbound connections and doing load balancing to a set of
registrar/proxies. This is working well with one exception:
I can't seem to get t_load_contacts/t_next_contacts working correctly for
handli