RTPENGINE not to insert these extra lines or
should I use, say LUA, to remove these extra SDP lines.
What is the correct way here
On Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:36 PM, Dmitry <mbike200...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[SR-Users] question about RTPengine
Does it mean that rtpengine_
0 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
Sent from my BlackBerry.
Original Message
From: Dmitry
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 07:43
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Reply To: Dmitry
Subject: [SR-Users] question abo
[SR-Users] question about RTPengine
Does it mean that rtpengine_manage() determine the session state itself? i.e it
is not needed to find out in the configuration file that INVITE contains SDP or
not because rtpengine_manage() determins internally what this INVITE is? am I
correct
://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
Sent from my BlackBerry.
Original Message
From: Dmitry
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 07:43
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Reply To: Dmitry
Subject: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine
___
SIP Express Router (SER
On 05/06/2016 07:36 AM, Dmitry wrote:
> hello
>
> i read the documentation about RTPengine.
> and the documentation says that:
>
> If INVITE with SDP, when the tm module is loaded, mark transaction with
> internal flag FL_SDP_BODY to know that the 1xx and 2xx are for
> rtpengine_answer()
>
>
hello
i read the documentation about RTPengine.and the documentation says that:
If INVITE with SDP, when the tm module is loaded, mark transaction with
internal flag FL_SDP_BODY to know that the 1xx and 2xx are for
rtpengine_answer()
what does it mean?
actually - according to 3261 RTP media
