Re: [SR-Users] sipml5 fail invite kamailio ims web sockets

2016-10-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, not much into ims these days, but from websocket point of view, the URI in contact, etc. for websocket is not resolvable, so one has to deal with same kind of processing as for nat in case of websocket. Cheers, Daniel On 20/10/16 12:21, Serhat Guler wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thank you for

Re: [SR-Users] sipml5 fail invite kamailio ims web sockets

2016-10-20 Thread Serhat Guler
Hi Daniel, Thank you for your reply. I'll defo check it out in the evening. Do you think the scenario I explained here (http://lists.sip-router.org/ pipermail/sr-users/2016-October/094831.html) might also be the case ? Cheers, Serhat On 20 October 2016 at 11:22, Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Re: [SR-Users] sipml5 fail invite kamailio ims web sockets

2016-10-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, it seems that the response to the invite doesn't have a Contact header. Can you check that? You can print the message in logs with $mb. Cheers, Daniel On 17/10/16 22:46, Serhat Guler wrote: > Dear all, > > I can register the sipml5 client to my kamailio IMS setup > successfully, but when

[SR-Users] sipml5 fail invite kamailio ims web sockets

2016-10-17 Thread Serhat Guler
Dear all, I can register the sipml5 client to my kamailio IMS setup successfully, but when I try to make a call the invite fails with "478 Unresolvable destination". From the wireshark trace file I think the PCSCF on the terminating side cannot resolve the destination. After the invite request