Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

If the SDP is correct, then you might have specific issues related to your specific deployment case. Snippets from others config files won't help. You really need to investigate and understand your particular issue that you are facing and fix it accordingly. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Oct 8, 2015

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

On 10/08/2015 09:09 AM, Ovidiu Sas wrote: > If the SDP is correct, then you might have specific issues related to > your specific deployment case. Snippets from others config files won't > help. You really need to investigate and understand your particular > issue that you are facing and fix it

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

I struggled with this setup for a while using rtpproxy, i eventually went with rtpengine because it seems to have more features and is still maintained. I wrote a quick how-to (mostly for myself to remember)

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

If the SDP is correct, then you might have specific issues related to your specific deployment case. Snippets from others config files won't help. You really need to investigate and understand your particular issue that you are facing and fix it accordingly. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Oct 8, 2015

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

On 30-09-15 13:29, Fred Posner wrote: Without a version of rtpproxy using the -A flag, you'll need to either (1) update to a different version of rtpproxy or (2) skip rtpproxy and have your asterisk handle all the rtp. I tried rtpproxy v2, with the -A flag in bridge mode ( -A

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

Dirk, in case of a change, i would suggest to evaluate the use of rtpengine ( https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine) Regards, Bruno 2015-09-30 13:15 GMT+02:00 Dirk Teurlings - SIGNET B.V. < dteurli...@signet.nl>: > On 30-09-15 12:23, Fred Posner wrote: > >> >> Are you using -A flag in rttproxy?

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

Dirk, have you tried to grab some trace with with sngrep? Maybe you'll be able to figure out what's happening. Regards, Bruno 2015-09-30 11:30 GMT+02:00 Dirk Teurlings - SIGNET B.V. < dteurli...@signet.nl>: > On 30-09-15 11:28, Daniel Tryba wrote: > >> A quick and dirty workaround might be the

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

On 30-09-15 12:23, Fred Posner wrote: Are you using -A flag in rttproxy? Unfortunately we're running a version of RTPPROXY at the moment that doesn't have this flag. I'm considering upgrading to rtproxy 2.0, but will need to test whether this doesn't affect anything else. It's preferred

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

On 09/30/2015 07:15 AM, Dirk Teurlings - SIGNET B.V. wrote: > On 30-09-15 12:23, Fred Posner wrote: >> >> Are you using -A flag in rttproxy? >> > > Unfortunately we're running a version of RTPPROXY at the moment that > doesn't have this flag. I'm considering upgrading to rtproxy 2.0, but > will

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

On 30-09-15 11:10, Daniel Tryba wrote: The asterisk doesn't need to know the network topology beyond its connection with kamailio, so you need to fix it at the place of traversal between public and private: kamailio. Agreed, I was looking for a workaround at this point, but to no avail.

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

On Wednesday 30 September 2015 11:17:54 Dirk Teurlings - SIGNET B.V. wrote: > Agreed, I was looking for a workaround at this point, but to no avail. A quick and dirty workaround might be the topoh module (which might break other things though). ___

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

On 30-09-15 11:28, Daniel Tryba wrote: A quick and dirty workaround might be the topoh module (which might break other things though). Already tried that as well, but that doesn't mask the private IP in the important places. It only hides them in the via and record-route headers. Cheers,

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

On 09/30/2015 04:22 AM, Dirk Teurlings - SIGNET B.V. wrote: > Hi, > > CLIENTS <-> (NAT) <-> INTERNET <-> KAMAILIO(4.2.5) with > RTPPROXY(v1) <-> PRIVATE LAN <-> ASTERISK (v1.8) > > > Any pointer or help would be greatly appriciated. > > Cheers, > Dirk > Are you using -A flag in

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

On Wednesday 30 September 2015 10:22:51 Dirk Teurlings - SIGNET B.V. wrote: > CLIENTS <-> (NAT) <-> INTERNET <-> KAMAILIO(4.2.5) with >RTPPROXY(v1) <-> PRIVATE LAN <-> ASTERISK (v1.8) > I'm kind of stuck as to where I need to fix this. I tried using the > externaddr option in Asterisk to

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

> On 30 Sep 2015, at 11:10, Daniel Tryba wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 September 2015 10:22:51 Dirk Teurlings - SIGNET B.V. wrote: >> CLIENTS <-> (NAT) <-> INTERNET <-> KAMAILIO(4.2.5) with >> RTPPROXY(v1) <-> PRIVATE LAN <-> ASTERISK (v1.8) > >> I'm kind of stuck as to

Re: [SR-Users] Familiar topic about Kamailio with Asterisk behind NAT

If you have kamailio bound to both private and public interfaces, then you need to run rtpproxy in bridge mode (vanilla rtpproxy). Another option is to get rid of the rtpproxy altogether and let asterisk handle the media, but you will need to make sure that: - kamailio is rewriting IPs in SDP