Is something wrong in my configuration? How these authenticate packets
should look?
I never used uac_auth() so far, but normally you send a request like an
INVITE
to the host, its then challenged with e.g. a 401 including a nonce and some
other parameters, you ACK it, and then you
On 07/02/2010 03:22 AM, Ján ONDREJ (SAL) wrote:
I use defaults, so looks like I use automatic restore. I don't know, how to
send it manually, so auto looks to be a good choice. uac_restore_from can't
be used from reply route.
If you are using the auto restore mode, it is not necessary to call
hello,
I use kamailio 1.5.4 with rtpproxy 1.2.1
I try to change the ptime (RTP packet size) with the Nathelper module .
to do it I call the function rtpproxy_offer with the option z20 but the
a=ptime:30 in SDP is not changed
any idea ?
Regards
Laurent
Log of
In order to change the attribute in the SDP, you need manually to alter the
SDP (at least for 1.5.x). Tha NAT-Helper module will not do this for you.
Please see the Textops-Module on how to do this.
Carsten
2010/7/2 Laurent Schweizer laurent.schwei...@peoplefone.com
hello,
I use kamailio
On 07/02/2010 04:22 AM, Carsten Bock wrote:
In order to change the attribute in the SDP, you need manually to alter
the SDP (at least for 1.5.x). Tha NAT-Helper module will not do this for
you. Please see the Textops-Module on how to do this.
So, the 'z' option to force_rtp_proxy() will only
Solved.
in asterisk-kamailio trunk config placed
nat=yes
canreinvite=no
Thank you for cooperation,
Dmitri
02.07.2010 0:51, dotnetdub пишет:
On 1 July 2010 22:41, Dmitri Korotkov dmitri.korot...@festart.ee
mailto:dmitri.korot...@festart.ee wrote:
Hi,
voice:/# ps auxf |grep
Correct. Maybe we could add this later, but for now, this is correct.
Carsten
2010/7/2 Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com
On 07/02/2010 04:22 AM, Carsten Bock wrote:
In order to change the attribute in the SDP, you need manually to alter
the SDP (at least for 1.5.x). Tha NAT-Helper
On 07/02/2010 04:27 AM, Carsten Bock wrote:
Correct. Maybe we could add this later, but for now, this is correct.
I see.
Well, this should probably be made clear in the documentation. I do
not think it is unreasonable for someone to think that
force_rtp_proxy(...zNN) performs necessary
Does anyone know a way how to block a subscribed user to send messages
with mailman, other than unsubscribing?
There is the option of nomail (not sending emails), but I am looking for
something that will get his/her email in bounces, so that such
auto-replies are filtered.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Jul 01, 2010 at 13:38, Juha Heinanen j...@tutpro.com wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Juha, I just committed on master and tested over MI where works fine.
Can you do some tests over rpc? If all ok then can be backported.
it would be nice if i could, but after trying to
Am 01.07.2010 17:40, schrieb Claudio Furrer:
Am 01.07.2010 14:38, schrieb Claudio Furrer:
Hi, I have a similar issue,
It is not possible to debug this issue without full SIP trace!
ngrep -Wbyline -t -d any port 5060
I find it unpleasant to read such a trace. Please really use ngrep to
On Friday 02 July 2010, Alex Balashov wrote:
[..]
I suppose it is kind of silly for me to say; I have commit privileges
for documentation, I should fix it myself. :-) Problem is I forget
how to use git, since I never do.
Hi Alex,
ok, if you send me a patch, or add it to the tracker i'll
Am 02.07.2010 15:54, schrieb Claudio Furrer:
Hi, I have a similar issue,
It is not possible to debug this issue without full SIP trace!
ngrep -Wbyline -t -d any port 5060
I find it unpleasant to read such a trace. Please really use ngrep to get a
nice formated SIP trace, or supply the
If you allways route the requests from the broken caller to the other
gateway, you can use something like that:
...
if (loose_route() {
if (src__ip=10.10.10.128) {
$rd=10.20.20.153;
$du=sip:10.20.20.153:5060;
}
... normal loose-route processing
t_relay();
exit;
}
...
14 matches
Mail list logo
