On 12/20/12 8:05 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
19 dec 2012 kl. 23:14 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com:
On 12/19/12 10:28 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
19 dec 2012 kl. 19:35 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com:
On 12/19/12 7:20 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
Hi Olle,
18 dec 2012 kl. 11:44 skrev Daniel Tryba dan...@pocos.nl:
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:21:24 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
you have to use it only once -- this is due to how the changes are done
to the sip message headers, but also because of adding a special
parameter to record-route
On 12/20/12 10:33 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
18 dec 2012 kl. 11:44 skrev Daniel Tryba dan...@pocos.nl:
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:21:24 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
you have to use it only once -- this is due to how the changes are done
to the sip message headers, but also because
Hello,
most of the duplicated or ser-specific modules were sorted out at this
time, next is the situation with the remaining ones.
A) modules that will be renamed using a prefix 'uid_', because they have
a database schema using unique id instead of username and domain:
- auth_db =
20 dec 2012 kl. 15:17 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com:
Hello,
most of the duplicated or ser-specific modules were sorted out at this time,
next is the situation with the remaining ones.
A) modules that will be renamed using a prefix 'uid_', because they have a
On 12/20/12 3:25 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
20 dec 2012 kl. 15:17 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com:
Hello,
most of the duplicated or ser-specific modules were sorted out at this time,
next is the situation with the remaining ones.
A) modules that will be renamed using a
Hello,
You should take a look to Radiator:
http://www.open.com.au/radiator/technical.html
It has some authentication methods for Microsoft.
Regards.
El 20/12/2012, a las 15:58, Moacir Ferreira moacirferre...@hotmail.com
escribió:
Yeah... I know it can be a kind of problem. But millions of
Moacir Ferreira writes:
Anyway, it is tricky but M$ (I liked the $ thing here) can do MD5. I
would love to see a #!define WITH_RADIUS at kakailio.cfg but we
don't have it.
i used to use radius authentication with kamailio for years, but
recently gave up on it due to extra complexity/load
On 12/20/12 4:13 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
- nathelper - some extra functionality, not sure if can be kept
completely
Maybe Andreas can look into this, as there is a lot of work going on with
nathelper and the new
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/20/12 4:13 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
- nathelper - some extra functionality, not sure if can be kept
completely
Maybe
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the difference between the db1 and db2 interface?
It is not the case here, modules_k/ldap does not have any relation to
database interface.
Any database module db_[DatabaseType] implements an API.
SER
Hello Daniel,
What patch this bug was fixed? This bug was open in 30 July 2012 and
ultimate Release to 3.1.X (3.1.6) was released at 14 July 2012...
Best Regards
2012/8/1 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
Hello,
On 7/31/12 3:39 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
Hello,
I didn't
Hello,
if you refer to free(0) issue with libssl, I am not sure it was ever put
in 3.1 branch, as the last release was before reporting the issue.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/20/12 6:01 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
Hello Daniel,
What patch this bug was fixed? This bug was open in 30 July 2012 and
On 12/20/12 3:58 PM, Moacir Ferreira wrote:
Yeah... I know it can be a kind of problem. But millions of companies
are using MS meaning we need to adapt if willing to work for the
enterprise market. If we do not offer some kind of integration with
AD, then we will end-up having 2 user names
Hi,
I refer the bug fix FS#247 that I open in 30 July 2012 and you closed in
25 october 2012 with the information: Reopen if the patch for free(0)
didn't work..
What Release this fix was included?
Best Regards
2012/12/20 Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
Hello,
if you refer to
I am attempting to move the location of the GROUP 'grp' table.
I created column grp in subscriber table and configured column with same
settings as default table and updated column name as follows:
modparam(group, db_url, DBURL)
modparam(group, table, subscriber)
modparam(group, use_domain, 1)
I thanks for the responses. However, I still don’t have a “vision”
on how I can address my problem. My key points here are: - Most of the
enterprise companies have a directory service
implemented already. So it does not make sense to create and maintain a second
one just for SIP clients. With
17 matches
Mail list logo
