Hi All,
I installed Kamailio server on my ubuntu machine. And installed rtpproxy
also in the same machine. I didm't make many changes to default
configuration files, kamctlrc and kamailio.cfg. Now I am able to
communicate between two SIP clients, if both sip clients are in the same
LAN. But I am
Hello Sirs, Sir Richard,
I understand the problem but I don't understand the behavior. Let me tell
you how I understood the problem and where I misunderstand the behavior.
BOB sens an offer to Alice with rtcp-mux. The flow is: UAC (bob) - Kamailio
- MP-NG - Kamailio - UAS (alice). From the offer,
Hello,
setting the hash size to 32MB is way too much, are you having like 100
000 000 active calls at the same time?
The size of the hash is used for computing the number of slots in the
hash table, not the capacity in terms of memory size of all items stored
in hash table.
Cheers,
Daniel
Hello,
I removed the restriction on nat_bflag (in master and 4.1 branches).
Can anyone test to see if all goes fine even for non-natted contacts?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 20/02/14 01:23, Alex Balashov wrote:
Okay, so maybe someone who knows the usrloc code better can correct me
on this, but I get
Hi,
Looking at http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/packages/debs the suggestion is
to use http://deb.kamailio.org/ for debian packages.
But the last version of kamailio 4.0 here is 4.0.3, and 4.1 doesn't
exist. The most files are last modified in 2013-08.. Here for example:
Hi Daniel,
I re-tested with your latest commit and it works as expected with my
current configuration (with nat_bflag unset in my case).
Thanks!
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mico...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I removed the restriction on nat_bflag (in master and
Dear List
I am trying to restrict 8 digit dial on my dialplan after the prefix 6859A
, could someone help me with the correct syntax?
Please see below what i have:
Dpid: 1
Pr: 1
Match Op: 1
Match Exp: sip:6859A(only 8 additional digits allowed).*
Match Len: 0
Subst Exp: sip:6859A(only 8
Hi, how are you all
I have a lab setup for using Kamailio and asterisk, with realtime, and
currently I am facing 2 problems.
The first one, is when trying to get the phones to reboot. Asterisk send a
notify with the message, reboot. But the phone answers with a 401, and asks
for a digest.
In a
On 02/20/14 04:15, Mihai Marin wrote:
Hello Sirs, Sir Richard,
I understand the problem but I don't understand the behavior. Let me
tell you how I understood the problem and where I misunderstand the
behavior.
BOB sens an offer to Alice with rtcp-mux. The flow is: UAC (bob) -
Kamailio -
2014-02-20 12:15, Henning Westerholt skrev:
Am Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2014, 11:53:04 schrieb Johan Wilfer:
Looking at http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/packages/debs the suggestion is
to use http://deb.kamailio.org/ for debian packages.
But the last version of kamailio 4.0 here is 4.0.3, and 4.1
Hi Daniel,
I am using async module to continue the transaction in
asynchronously. But I am observing a leak in shared memory. Then i checked
the code, we are not freeing the async_item_t after calling t_continue.
Same this has checked with MEMDBG=1.
Original code:
while(1) {
Hi, All!
Try to register user in Kamailio and then relay REG massage to Asterisk.
Asterisk register user and looks good.
But when I send Unreg message to Kamailio, it unregister user successfully
but Asterisk say: Message REGISTER Ignoring because retransmit (CSeq 1234
our CSeq 1234).
Did
Hi,
I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement of an ACME
Packet Net-Net Session Border Controller.
By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly:
- it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations
- it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection
Hi,
Following my issue with the above
1.Is there a way to see if a worker (child) is processing a transaction
for too long (let's say 2-3 sec)?
2.Is there an option to see if the DB connection is alive? (I am
familiar with db_mysql options)
3.If all workers are stuck on
Hi Francesco,
i would recommend, you look at the SEMS-project and it's SBC module.
From the functionality perspective, i don't think you'll miss anything
compared to Acme Packet, latest trunk version even has a Registration
cache, which works absolutely great...
Kind regards,
Carsten
2014-02-20
Hello,
On 20/02/14 18:32, Uri Shacked wrote:
Hi,
Following my issue with the above
1.Is there a way to see if a worker (child) is processing a
transaction for too long (let’s say 2-3 sec)?
you can get a log message when execution of an action is slow, see:
Alex's article is one of my favorites. That being said, we switched out
an Acme SBC for openser (at the time) and was immediately thrilled.
Fred Posner
The Palner Group, Inc.
503-914-0999 (direct)
954-472-2896 (fax)
On 02/20/2014 01:14 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Francesco,
Have a look at this
Did you try this;
http://www.palner.com/blog/303/kamailio-behind-nat/#more-303
Regards,
Arun
From: Neo Quartz neoqua...@gmail.com
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] NAT traversal problem with
Hello,
thanks for reporting, I pushed a slightly different patch in master, 4.1
and 4.0 branches -- free is done even when ai-act is null.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 20/02/14 15:13, Surendra wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I am using async module to continue the transaction in
asynchronously. But I am
Can you give some example of your use cases for them?
I cannot say for sure, but my intuition is that if you have three hundred
variables in any program, you're doing something wrong. At that point you're in
territory that clearly calls for some sort of non- scalar data structure, such
as an
@Carsten
I looked at http://www.iptel.org/sems and seems to be only broken links to
downloads.
Do you know if the project is still maintained?
@Fred
Are you using openser as a B2BUA?
Il giorno 20/feb/2014, alle ore 19:42, Fred Posner f...@palner.com ha scritto:
Alex's article is one of my
Hi All,
I have around 300 AVP's and quite amount of VAR's are used in the config
file? Does that impact performance?, If so how can i improve it?
Thanks
Jijo
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
You don't need B2B functionality to provide SBC functionality.
SBC is a loose term these days. All you need is properly crafted signaling
to achieve you requirements.
Using a SIP proxy server as an SBC is pretty common these days.
Regards
Ovidiu Sas
On Feb 20, 2014 5:55 PM, Francesco Maria
Hi Francesco,
Yes, SEMS is well maintained (i don't know, how well the website is
maintained).
You find the souce-code here:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sems;a=summary
Kind regards,
Carsten
Am 20.02.2014 23:55 schrieb Francesco Maria Magnini fmm1...@gmail.com:
@Carsten
I
or a dedicated module :)
On Feb 20, 2014 5:38 PM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.com wrote:
Can you give some example of your use cases for them?
I cannot say for sure, but my intuition is that if you have three hundred
variables in any program, you're doing something wrong. At that
Fred,
in you ACME replacement, kamailio doesn’t rewrite headers for handling
RTP/SIGNALING and stay in the middle?
Il giorno 21/feb/2014, alle ore 00:03, Fred Posner f...@palner.com ha scritto:
On 2/20/14, 5:55 PM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:
@Carsten
I looked at
On 2/20/14, 6:25 PM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:
Fred,
in you ACME replacement, kamailio doesn’t rewrite headers for handling
RTP/SIGNALING and stay in the middle?
For nat it did. For others the media server did.
You can easily force all connections to use rtpproxy to do what you ask.
We
Hi Francesco,
o Carsten Bock on 02/21/2014 12:05 AM:
Hi Francesco,
Yes, SEMS is well maintained (i don't know, how well the website is
maintained).
You find the souce-code here:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sems;a=summary
Carsten is right that SEMS is maintained, but
We have defined dedicated AVP variables for each feature. For example, SIP
Trunks or Subscribers or Media Handling or Header Manipulation etc, So the
no of variables (AVP) has been increased in the initialization.
At an instance the no of AVP's used/active might be quite low as each avp's
are
AVPs are in shared men and protected by locks. VARs are not.
There shouldn't be a big impact on using lots of them. Are you experiencing
any issues?
Regards
Ovidiu Sas
On Feb 20, 2014 7:32 PM, Jijo realj...@gmail.com wrote:
We have defined dedicated AVP variables for each feature. For example,
Maybe you should replace AVPs with VARs where needed. Vars are more
lightweight and with a per-process scope only.
Regards,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Ovidiu Sas o...@voipembedded.com wrote:
AVPs are in shared men and protected by locks. VARs are not.
There shouldn't be a big impact on
Am 20.02.2014 15:08, schrieb Johan Wilfer:
2014-02-20 12:15, Henning Westerholt skrev:
Am Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2014, 11:53:04 schrieb Johan Wilfer:
Looking at http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/packages/debs the suggestion is
to use http://deb.kamailio.org/ for debian packages.
But the last
Hi all,
What is the difference between Called number address in Request-Line and
Called number in TO field?
If the Called Number address is different which one shall be taken? Is
there any RFC recommendation governing this?
For example : if in REQUEST-LINE it is 61977 and in TO it is
The Request URI (request line) is the one that should be used for any routing
purpose. The To field is a purely cosmetic commentary on the intended logical
destination of the call--it should never be used for routing determination.
Amar S Tuladhar a...@smarttel.com.np wrote:
Hi all,
What
34 matches
Mail list logo
