Re: [SR-Users] LDAP and Kerberos backend for authentification / Or PAM / SASL ?

2014-04-23 Thread Yoann Gini
Le 22 avr. 2014 à 11:03, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com a écrit : the constraint to have access to text password or HA1 format (md5 over username, password, realm) comes from WWW Authentication mechanism which is used by SIP. Writing something different in kamailio would be

Re: [SR-Users] Kam 4.1 Crash: HELP PLZ!!!!

2014-04-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Are the error messages before those with realloc related to failing sending on branch 0? Any error messages related to sending an empty buffer? Daniel On 22/04/14 15:34, Samuel D Ware wrote: Apr 3 13:14:32 tel-vc-fs03 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7589]: : core [mem/q_malloc.c:468]: qm_free():

Re: [SR-Users] LDAP and Kerberos backend for authentification / Or PAM / SASL ?

2014-04-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 23/04/14 08:06, Yoann Gini wrote: Le 22 avr. 2014 à 11:03, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com mailto:mico...@gmail.com a écrit : the constraint to have access to text password or HA1 format (md5 over username, password, realm) comes from WWW Authentication mechanism which is

[SR-Users] Can anyone Help with RTP Proxy Recording

2014-04-23 Thread sam
Hi, I am running a SIP Service using Kamailio. I have activated the RTP Proxy Recording. I need two things to be done. 1. RTP files saved need to have caller and callee usernames as file names. 2. Need to convert RTP files to mp3. Can anyone assist on this? Thanks SamG DS Media

[SR-Users] Pick domain name of a user from location list of siremis

2014-04-23 Thread aawaise
Hello all, I want to pick the domain name of a particular online user from location list of siremis and then perform some action on this basis. How can it be picked ?? Secondly how can the user name of called user be picked from the INVITE packet received by the server ?? Any help will be

Re: [SR-Users] LCR from_uri help

2014-04-23 Thread Juha Heinanen
Geoffrey Mina writes: Right now, I would think that with our Priority of 0 on the route with the from_URI match, the algorithm should always look at that one first and route the calls accordingly. Since we have the priority correctly set to evaluate in the order we want, what next can we

Re: [SR-Users] DRouting, routeid is not triggered

2014-04-23 Thread Maciej Bylica
Hi Daniel, Here is debug you requested. DEBUG: core [parser/msg_parser.c:623]: parse_msg(): SIP Request: DEBUG: core [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: INVITE DEBUG: core [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: sip:43111223344@10.10.10.5 DEBUG: core

[SR-Users] test if record_route() has been called already?

2014-04-23 Thread Juha Heinanen
is there any means to test if record_route() has been called already on the request? if it is called more than once, error message is issued. -- juha ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list

[SR-Users] RTPProxy and premature RTP

2014-04-23 Thread Daniel Tryba
I'm having some troubles with a provider sending RTP before a 183 Session Progress or 200 OK (I see up to 1s of rtp prematurely). The machine is running rtpproxy and apparently rtpproxy buffers these rtp packets and flushed them in one burst when the 183/200 arrive, this creates havock in some

Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy and premature RTP

2014-04-23 Thread Alex Balashov
On 04/23/2014 07:36 AM, Daniel Tryba wrote: I'm having some troubles with a provider sending RTP before a 183 Session Progress or 200 OK (I see up to 1s of rtp prematurely). The machine is running rtpproxy and apparently rtpproxy buffers these rtp packets and flushed them in one burst when the

Re: [SR-Users] Realtime integration: Unregistered clients showing as registered?

2014-04-23 Thread Olli Heiskanen
Hello, Gracias Pedro, kiitos Mikko. It's good to know I have configured Kamailio correctly. I added the type into my table but so far no luck having asterisk see the clients registered, at least on cli. I do see that asterisk adds registration data into the table. I'll work on this for a bit and

[SR-Users] TCP reset

2014-04-23 Thread Daniel Ciprus
Hi, Is there any way to remove registration entry from registrar (Kamailio IMS built on stable 4.1) detected on p-cscf by incoming TCP RST from the network ? What's happening is that client is loosing connections/crashing and TCP RST is sent back to pcscf which is not propagating changes back

Re: [SR-Users] TCP reset

2014-04-23 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi Daniel, what you want, is basically already implemented in the Standard usrloc module, see: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/usrloc.html#usrloc.p.handle_lost_tcp We haven't implemented that feature yet in the IMS modules Schöne Grüße, Carsten 2014-04-23 15:47 GMT+02:00

Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy and premature RTP

2014-04-23 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Wednesday 23 April 2014 13:41:42 Alex Balashov wrote: Just of curiosity, how exactly does the havoc manifest itself? What are the symptoms of this being a problem? Havoc might be a bit strong (though great confusion and disorder fits well). Bad sound quality (if any sound) for a longer

Re: [SR-Users] TCP reset

2014-04-23 Thread Daniel Ciprus
Thanks Carsten, Any plans to do so in near future ? :-) On 04/23/2014 09:52 AM, Carsten Bock wrote: Hi Daniel, what you want, is basically already implemented in the Standard usrloc module, see: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/usrloc.html#usrloc.p.handle_lost_tcp We haven't

Re: [SR-Users] Realtime integration: Unregistered clients showing as registered?

2014-04-23 Thread Pedro Niño
Try to install sngrep In both hosts (Kamailio and asterisk). It will help you figure what is happening more clear. I'll double check my own config, and Let you know the needed fields, At least for my case. I used the same integration guide, and splitted the model in 3 servers. One for

Re: [SR-Users] Realtime integration: Unregistered clients showing as registered?

2014-04-23 Thread Pedro Niño
Ahhh also, don't forget to place the *rtcachefriends*=*yes* in your sip.conf (asterisk) to show the realtime peers El abr 23, 2014 8:29 AM, Olli Heiskanen ohjelmistoarkkite...@gmail.com escribió: Hello, Gracias Pedro, kiitos Mikko. It's good to know I have configured Kamailio correctly. I

[SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage() issues in rtpproxy-ng

2014-04-23 Thread Alex Balashov
Hello, I'm running the latest pull of Kamailio 4.1 (last commit be187e135b0b9b28136817c3569ab5c0abcc5b3f) and am using rtpproxy-ng with a recent mediaproxy-ng master (commit cb6990e43864b077dd6a24acfbdf5ef76c1a427e). For no apparent reason, Kamailio has stopped sending 'offer' commands to

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage() issues in rtpproxy-ng

2014-04-23 Thread Alex Balashov
If it helps, here are my rtpproxy-ng modparams: modparam(rtpproxy-ng, rtpproxy_sock, 1 == udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5050) modparam(rtpproxy-ng, rtpproxy_disable_tout, 120) modparam(rtpproxy-ng, rtpproxy_tout, 1) modparam(rtpproxy-ng, rtpproxy_retr, 2) -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage() issues in rtpproxy-ng

2014-04-23 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 04/23/14 11:53, Alex Balashov wrote: Hello, I'm running the latest pull of Kamailio 4.1 (last commit be187e135b0b9b28136817c3569ab5c0abcc5b3f) and am using rtpproxy-ng with a recent mediaproxy-ng master (commit cb6990e43864b077dd6a24acfbdf5ef76c1a427e). For no apparent reason,

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage() issues in rtpproxy-ng

2014-04-23 Thread Alex Balashov
On 04/23/2014 12:08 PM, Richard Fuchs wrote: Can you please clarify: does it not send anything at all, or does it send an answer instead of an offer? Well, I suppose I can't say for sure, but it looks like it's not sending anything at all. When I grep a particular Call-ID, the first thing I

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage() issues in rtpproxy-ng

2014-04-23 Thread Alex Balashov
Maybe it's not a bug. I think I've got a theory about what may be happening. Admittedly, it's not trivial to follow, but bear with me. The invocation of rtpproxy_manage() is happening in a REQUEST_ROUTE that is actually being triggered out of a FAILURE_ROUTE, because we are pulling routing

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage() issues in rtpproxy-ng

2014-04-23 Thread Alex Balashov
The reason I had not previously considered this possibility is because the documentation says--or, at least to my lackadaisical interpretation--that rtpproxy_manage() will only call rtpproxy_answer() if it is operating on a 1xx/2xx reply with SDP, otherwise it'll send rtpproxy_offer(), or send

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage() issues in rtpproxy-ng

2014-04-23 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 04/23/14 12:59, Alex Balashov wrote: The reason I had not previously considered this possibility is because the documentation says--or, at least to my lackadaisical interpretation--that rtpproxy_manage() will only call rtpproxy_answer() if it is operating on a 1xx/2xx reply with SDP,

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage() issues in rtpproxy-ng

2014-04-23 Thread Alex Balashov
On 04/23/2014 01:22 PM, Richard Fuchs wrote: Main selection criterion is whether the message is a request or a reply, second criterion is the SIP method (taken from the CSeq) and/or the response code in case of a reply. The route type is only marginally relevant. Yeah, so the key question is:

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy_manage() issues in rtpproxy-ng

2014-04-23 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 04/23/14 13:24, Alex Balashov wrote: On 04/23/2014 01:22 PM, Richard Fuchs wrote: Main selection criterion is whether the message is a request or a reply, second criterion is the SIP method (taken from the CSeq) and/or the response code in case of a reply. The route type is only

[SR-Users] IBM SIP server has implemented proxy managed overload protection

2014-04-23 Thread Yang Hong
Hello Folks. According the new update on Feb 5, 2014, IBM has implemented proxy managed overload protection (PMOP) at SIP proxy server. http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v7r0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.websphere.nd.doc%2Finfo%2Fae%2Fae%2Fcjpx_sippxovldpro.html The above IBM link lists

Re: [SR-Users] LDAP and Kerberos backend for authentification / Or PAM / SASL ?

2014-04-23 Thread Yoann Gini
Le 23 avr. 2014 à 09:50, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com a écrit : However, SIP RFC enforces www digest authentication and it is what all the phones I am aware of in the wild support now. Thanks for all this informations. That explain me why all SIP product I see on the market

[SR-Users] Processing on Invite Packet

2014-04-23 Thread aawaise
Hello, On arrival of INVITE packet to the Kamailio server, which module is used to take in response to Invite packet. Other than record_route, which records the route. And what to do if we want to add some actions in response to INVITE packet. Cheers. -- View this message in context:

[SR-Users] Difference between route(RELAY) and t_relay

2014-04-23 Thread aawaise
Hi all, I want to know while coding kamailio.cfg. What factor determines that route(RELAY) should be used or t_relay ?? Thanks. Cheers. -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Difference-between-route-RELAY-and-t-relay-tp127098.html Sent from the Users

[SR-Users] Problem accessing git repository

2014-04-23 Thread arun Jayaprakash
Is there a problem with the git repository? When I try to download kamailio (git clone --depth 1 git://git.sip-router.org/sip-router kamailio ) I get an error saying that  git.sip-router.org can not be reached. Please let me know, thank you. Arun___

Re: [SR-Users] Difference between route(RELAY) and t_relay

2014-04-23 Thread Olle E. Johansson
On 24 Apr 2014, at 06:58, aawaise owaisul...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi all, I want to know while coding kamailio.cfg. What factor determines that route(RELAY) should be used or t_relay ?? route(RELAY) is a call to a routeblock that calls t_relay. Check that route block - what it does in your