Re: [SR-Users] Selective rport behaviour

Hi Alex, I had the same problem as you and I couldn't find a way to selectively reply to via. What I ended up doing is the following dirty trick... Before a transaction is created for the processed message I do: if (SOME CONDITION) { remove_hf_value("Via[-1].rport");

Re: [SR-Users] failed to find command http_async_query - Even though module loaded

Hi, are you sure that on server 2 you are running 4.4 branch? The three params version of the query has been removed in master in this commit https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/61adc6e16c73070bd3f8a9a04efa18263793a270 . Setting the query's body is now done through the $http_req

[SR-Users] failed to find command http_async_query - Even though module loaded

Hi guys, I am using the http_async_client module to POST some requests to a Web Interface, and on server 1 it all works well. I have done a fresh install from github, version 4.4 on Centos 6.8 on server 2, and kamailio wont start. Its the same configuration file, however it states; failed to

Re: [SR-Users] Selective rport behaviour

On 09/22/2016 10:55 AM, Daniel Tryba wrote: force_rport seems to override any rport available in via, so reply_to_via has no additional effects. Thanks, that was helpful. But so, if force_rport() is not used, do I need reply_to_via=1 in order to have replies go back to the declared port in

Re: [SR-Users] Killing dialog using kamcmd

Hello, I'm not sure if it is a bug of 4.3 branch.. need to test it on 4.4.. it should write down the record on DB automatically Laura Il 22/09/16 14:20, ycaner ha scritto: > Hello; > i use a event route like below for radius request. there is a acc_request > for it. you can use it > >

Re: [SR-Users] Selective rport behaviour

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:58:33AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote: > Normally, we just force_rport() on all incoming requests so that we reply to > the real source port of the request, since most endpoints on this > installation are NAT'd. > > However, occasionally we run into a scenario where an ALG

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

Thank you Charles, Cheers José Seabra 2016-09-22 14:19 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance : > Hi, > > On 22 September 2016 at 14:08, José Seabra wrote: > >> Hi charles, >> Inline >> Thanks >> >> 2016-09-22 13:51 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance

[SR-Users] Selective rport behaviour

Hi, In some scenarios, it happens that a request is received with the following characteristics: IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:14000 -> server:5060 Via: SIP/2.0/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060;branch=9hG4bKblah;rport Normally, we just force_rport() on all incoming requests so that we reply to the real source

Re: [SR-Users] Addressing a distinct PSI result is: 555 AS Contacting Failed - iFC terminated dialog

Hi Carsten, I had to update the file modules/tm/t_suspend.c (see attachment). I did following change and hope I did not cause any side effects: /* which route block type were we in when we were suspended */ cb_type = FAILURE_CB_TYPE; switch

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

Hi, On 22 September 2016 at 14:08, José Seabra wrote: > Hi charles, > Inline > Thanks > > 2016-09-22 13:51 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance : > >> Hi José, >> >> In your config, you need to tell DMQ about a minimum of one other node. >> This can be

Re: [SR-Users] Addressing a distinct PSI result is: 555 AS Contacting Failed - iFC terminated dialog

Hi Valentin, where was it? Greeting from Hamburg, Carsten 2016-09-22 14:58 GMT+02:00 Valentin Christoph : > Hi all, > > > > No further need to investigate. > > > > I found the bug. > > > > Thanks, > > Christoph > > > > *From:* sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

Hi charles, Inline Thanks 2016-09-22 13:51 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance : > Hi José, > > In your config, you need to tell DMQ about a minimum of one other node. > This can be in the form of an IP or FQDN - however, where the FQDN resolves > to a single IP, it does not

Re: [SR-Users] Addressing a distinct PSI result is: 555 AS Contacting Failed - iFC terminated dialog

Hi all, No further need to investigate. I found the bug. Thanks, Christoph From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Valentin Christoph Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:13 PM To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Cc: Onic Roman Subject: [SR-Users] Addressing a

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

Hi José, In your config, you need to tell DMQ about a minimum of one other node. This can be in the form of an IP or FQDN - however, where the FQDN resolves to a single IP, it does not make sense to perform anything other than an A lookup, so you should set the parameter to 0 in this case. The

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

Hi Charles I have modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 1) because my A record resolves more than one Kamailio addresses, and if i understood well the documentation says that we need set it to a value different of 0 to resolve all ip addresses associated to the Name configured on DMQ. I'm using DMQ with

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

Hey, On 22 September 2016 at 12:18, José Seabra wrote: > Hello Daniel and Charles, > Thank you for your feedback. > Another doubt is when we use a FQDN that only resolves as A record, would > be better DMQ send only a A query or is there any reason for always try SRV? > >

Re: [SR-Users] Killing dialog using kamcmd

Hello; i use a event route like below for radius request. there is a acc_request for it. you can use it event_route[tm:local-request]{ xlog("L_ALERT","Local-Request [$ci] "); if(is_method("BYE")){ acc_rad_request("Timeout"); } } -- View this message

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

Hello Daniel and Charles, Thank you for your feedback. Another doubt is when we use a FQDN that only resolves as A record, would be better DMQ send only a A query or is there any reason for always try SRV? Thank you for your great job. BR José Seabra 2016-09-22 8:33 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance

Re: [SR-Users] ndb_mongodb -Sending Query to Mongo

Hello, Ok cool thanks Daniel will do that. Cheers Jon To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org From: mico...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:28:19 +0200 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] ndb_mongodb -Sending Query to Mongo Hello, in case of ndb_mongodb, the result is the json returned

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - DMQ dns srv Question

Hello, I can take a look today. Cheers, Charles On 22 Sep 2016 06:20, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote: > Hello, > > I guess that the one who did the implementation of the srv query for dmq > hasn't "allocated" any service name. I haven't looked at the sources, but I >