Re: [SR-Users] INVITE timeout timer

[Alex Balashov]

Hi,

fr_timer and fr_inv_timer do different things:

- fr_timer goes off when there's no response _at all_ to the INVITE, not 
even 100 Trying.


- If you received a 100 Trying or other provisional (1xx) repy, 
fr_inv_timer will apply instead.


-- Alex

--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC

Tel: +1-706-510-6800 (direct) / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] INVITE timeout timer

[Diogenes Aviles]

I have changed the following tm parameters in order to have an timeout
INVITE equal to 20 sec (2 ms).
# - tm params -
# auto-discard branches from previous serial forking leg
modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 0)
# default retransmission timeout: 20sec
modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 2)
# default invite retransmission timeout after 1xx: 120sec
modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 12)

However, the timeout is ever  3 min (180 sec.)
In accord to tm module the timeout is defined only by "r_timer"
Then, I don't know where is the problem.

Thanks a lot for your help.

-- 
Diogenes
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] usage of app_mono : how to communicate results back to config file

[Pranathi Venkatayogi]

Hi,
 I am using app_mono module and building my logic in c# app.
 I am unable to understand how to send the decision back to kamalio.cfg.

More precisely:
   I would like my routing logic to allow specific user names though they are 
not registered as subscribers. Like: 
transl...@myip.cyracom.com
   I have the logic in c# app which takes $ru and validates such that:
Host is myip.cyracom.com
User is translate
   How do I communicate the decision if it is valid or not back to my config 
script.
   Do I need to introduce new pseudo variable for this purpose?

Thanks,
Pranathi


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] Send SIP Info within a dialog using $uac_req(method)="INFO"

[Jonathan Hunter]

Hi Daniel,

I am just trying to put the mi command into jsonrpc_exec and looking at the 
documentation, Im not sure in this instance how to put down multiple parameters.

Running this command works in command line;

kamctl mi t_uac_dlg INFO sip:3003@193.144.1.112  . . 
\"From:sip:1234@8.8.8.8"\r\nTo:sip:3003@193.144.1.112\r\nContact:sip:daemon@8.8.8.8\r\n\""

However if I then look to run it, I have tried the following (amongst other 
variations);


jsonrpc_exec('{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"mi","params": ["t_uac_dlg", "INFO", 
"sip:3003@193.144.1.112",.,.,"From:sip:1234@8.8.8.8","To:sip:3003@193.144.1.112","Contact:sip:daemon@8.8.8.8"]}');

I get;

ERROR: jsonrpc-s [jsonrpc-s_mod.c:1129]: jsonrpc_exec_ex(): invalid json doc 
[[{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"mi","params": ["t_uac_dlg", "INFO", 
"sip:3003@193.144.1.112",.,.,"From:sip:1234@8.8.8.8","To:sip:3003@193.144.1.112","Contact:sip:daemon@8.8.8.8"]}]]

Can you give me some clues on how to input the params as its not clear to me 
from kamailio or json rpc docs.



Many thanks

Jon





From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla 
Sent: 17 October 2016 09:45
To: Jonathan Hunter; Kamailio SER - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Send SIP Info within a dialog using 
$uac_req(method)="INFO"


Hello,

if you want to run an MI command over RPC, you have to use 'mi' as the rpc 
command and the MI command as the first parameter, followed by the rest of the 
parameters for the command.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 14/10/16 14:23, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Daniel,

Also I am trying to fire that command using jsonrpc_exec and I keep getting;


jsonrpc_exec_ex(): method callback not found [t_uac_dlg]

I have tried with t.uac_dlg and get the same response, can you let me know if 
this command is support with this module on 4.3 please and if so what am I 
doing wrong with the syntax?

Thanks

Jon


From: hunter...@hotmail.com
To: mico...@gmail.com; 
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:52:25 +
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Send SIP Info within a dialog using 
$uac_req(method)="INFO"

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the response, sorry I must of missed this!

I was thinking of using the t_uac_dlg command to generate the INFO message, but 
will this allow me to do it within an established INVITE dialog?

I am just worried that changing the CSEQ value will cause issues, so am I 
better looking to modify in a B2BUA rather than the proxy, or will the dialog 
module handle this?

Thanks

Jon



To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
From: mico...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 12:41:32 +0200
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Send SIP Info within a dialog using 
$uac_req(method)="INFO"

Hello,
uac_req_send() is able to send only initial requests (with follow up on auth 
challenge). It doesn't expose the ability to send requests within a dialog -- 
the functions exist in c (tm module), but not availble in config.
On the other hand, there should be a mi/rpc command exported by tm module that 
allows that -- it may be possible to do it from config file via jsonrpc-s 
module.
Cheers,
Daniel


On 29/09/16 21:41, Jonathan Hunter wrote:

Hi Guys,

Is it still the case that when using uac_req_send, you cant send withing a 
specific dialog?

I can modify call-id, but I presume tags may be more of a problem?

See old post below from 2015;

> I am familiar with uac_req_send. but how do I send it with in a
> specific dialog and with data in the INFO req ?
sending a new request inside a dialog is not possible with
uac_req_send(). It is not easy over all because you change the sequence
order (CSeq value). Practically, you need to track how many requests you
sent from the middle to update (and restore in reply) when caller or
callee sends a new request.

dialog module can track changes in CSeq for requests sent to callee,
being used now for authentication of INVITE to another provider, when
Kamailio adds the credentials. But for more you would need to extend the
dialog module.

I just need to send a SIP info within an established dialog to stop some 
function up stream, so wondered if this is still a blocker?

Many thanks

Jon



___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users



--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Oct 24-26, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com

___ SIP Express Router (SER) and 
Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list 

Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy benchmark

[Gholamreza Sabery]

No not the first time. But over time. I rebooted my system and error is
gone! It seems that it happens over time.

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla  wrote:

> Are you getting the error first time when you reach first 1900 sessions?
> Or after a while, after some previous sessions are ended?
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 14/11/16 11:19, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
>
> I already set these parameters:
>
> rtpproxy -m 5000 -M 65000
>
> As well limits for number of open files are set to 100 (ulimit -n).
> When I increased log level of RTPProxy I saw:
> ERR:create_twinlistener:GENERAL: can't create IPv4 socket: Too many open
> files in system
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> first thing to look at is the port range. There are some parameter that
>> you can provide to rtpproxy in command line in order to increase the range
>> of port it can use -- see 'rtpproxy -h' or 'man rtpproxy'.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 14/11/16 11:14, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
>>
>> Dear Daniel:
>>
>> I used a single RTPProxy instance. RTPProxy version = 20040107. And yes
>> there was traffic for all calls but traffic is one-way. One leg sends the
>> call and the other just receives it.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>> mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> have you used a single rtpproxy instance? Was there RTP traffic for all
>>> 1900 calls? Is this with rtpproxy 1.2 or 2.0?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On 14/11/16 10:44, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
>>>
>>> I managed to create about 1900 concurrent calls using a single Kamailio
>>> and RTPProxy server. But after this number RTPProxy returns 0 and the
>>> following error is shown in the Kamailio log files:
>>>
>>> incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy
>>>
>>> What is the problem here? Also number of file descriptors that RTPProxy can 
>>> use are set to a million.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing 
>>> listsr-us...@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - 
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>>>
>>> ___ SIP Express Router
>>> (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cg
>>> i-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - 
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>>
>> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - 
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>
>
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy benchmark

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Are you getting the error first time when you reach first 1900 sessions?
Or after a while, after some previous sessions are ended?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 14/11/16 11:19, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
> I already set these parameters:
>
> rtpproxy -m 5000 -M 65000
>
> As well limits for number of open files are set to 100 (ulimit
> -n). When I increased log level of RTPProxy I saw:
> ERR:create_twinlistener:GENERAL: can't create IPv4 socket: Too many
> open files in system
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> > wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> first thing to look at is the port range. There are some parameter
> that you can provide to rtpproxy in command line in order to
> increase the range of port it can use -- see 'rtpproxy -h' or 'man
> rtpproxy'.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 14/11/16 11:14, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
>> Dear Daniel:
>>
>> I used a single RTPProxy instance. RTPProxy version = 20040107.
>> And yes there was traffic for all calls but traffic is one-way.
>> One leg sends the call and the other just receives it.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> > wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> have you used a single rtpproxy instance? Was there RTP
>> traffic for all 1900 calls? Is this with rtpproxy 1.2 or 2.0?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 14/11/16 10:44, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
>>> I managed to create about 1900 concurrent calls using a
>>> single Kamailio and RTPProxy server. But after this number
>>> RTPProxy returns 0 and the following error is shown in the
>>> Kamailio log files:
>>>
>>> incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy
>>> What is the problem here? Also number of file descriptors
>>> that RTPProxy can use are set to a million.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing 
>>> list
>>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>>> 
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>> 
>>
>> -- 
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  - 
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> 
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - 
>> http://www.asipto.com
>>
>> ___ SIP Express
>> Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> 
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>  
>>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  - 
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> 
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - 
> http://www.asipto.com
>
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy benchmark

[Gholamreza Sabery]

I already set these parameters:

rtpproxy -m 5000 -M 65000

As well limits for number of open files are set to 100 (ulimit -n).
When I increased log level of RTPProxy I saw:
ERR:create_twinlistener:GENERAL: can't create IPv4 socket: Too many open
files in system


On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> first thing to look at is the port range. There are some parameter that
> you can provide to rtpproxy in command line in order to increase the range
> of port it can use -- see 'rtpproxy -h' or 'man rtpproxy'.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 14/11/16 11:14, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
>
> Dear Daniel:
>
> I used a single RTPProxy instance. RTPProxy version = 20040107. And yes
> there was traffic for all calls but traffic is one-way. One leg sends the
> call and the other just receives it.
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> have you used a single rtpproxy instance? Was there RTP traffic for all
>> 1900 calls? Is this with rtpproxy 1.2 or 2.0?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 14/11/16 10:44, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
>>
>> I managed to create about 1900 concurrent calls using a single Kamailio
>> and RTPProxy server. But after this number RTPProxy returns 0 and the
>> following error is shown in the Kamailio log files:
>>
>> incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy
>>
>> What is the problem here? Also number of file descriptors that RTPProxy can 
>> use are set to a million.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing 
>> listsr-us...@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - 
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>>
>> ___ SIP Express Router (SER)
>> and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cg
>> i-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - 
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>
>
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy benchmark

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

first thing to look at is the port range. There are some parameter that
you can provide to rtpproxy in command line in order to increase the
range of port it can use -- see 'rtpproxy -h' or 'man rtpproxy'.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 14/11/16 11:14, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
> Dear Daniel:
>
> I used a single RTPProxy instance. RTPProxy version = 20040107. And
> yes there was traffic for all calls but traffic is one-way. One leg
> sends the call and the other just receives it.
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> > wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> have you used a single rtpproxy instance? Was there RTP traffic
> for all 1900 calls? Is this with rtpproxy 1.2 or 2.0?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 14/11/16 10:44, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
>> I managed to create about 1900 concurrent calls using a single
>> Kamailio and RTPProxy server. But after this number RTPProxy
>> returns 0 and the following error is shown in the Kamailio log files:
>>
>> incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy
>> What is the problem here? Also number of file descriptors that
>> RTPProxy can use are set to a million.
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org 
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> 
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda  - 
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> 
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - 
> http://www.asipto.com
>
> ___ SIP Express Router
> (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> 
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>  
>
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy benchmark

[Gholamreza Sabery]

Dear Daniel:

I used a single RTPProxy instance. RTPProxy version = 20040107. And yes
there was traffic for all calls but traffic is one-way. One leg sends the
call and the other just receives it.

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> have you used a single rtpproxy instance? Was there RTP traffic for all
> 1900 calls? Is this with rtpproxy 1.2 or 2.0?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 14/11/16 10:44, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
>
> I managed to create about 1900 concurrent calls using a single Kamailio
> and RTPProxy server. But after this number RTPProxy returns 0 and the
> following error is shown in the Kamailio log files:
>
> incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy
>
> What is the problem here? Also number of file descriptors that RTPProxy can 
> use are set to a million.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing 
> listsr-us...@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - 
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] BYE dispatcher

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

your are welcome! Glad to hear it was sorted out.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 13/11/16 06:50, Slava Bendersky wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
> I resolved all configuration issues and right now call goes both
> directions include rtp.
> Again huge thank you for help.
>
> Slava.
> 
> *From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" 
> *To: *"volga629" 
> *Cc: *"sr-users" 
> *Sent: *Thursday, 10 November, 2016 12:24:57
> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] BYE dispatcher
>
> Hello,
>
> this logic is definitely wrong -- FreeSwitch can send also a request,
> it means that you send it back to it.
>
> Only the initial request of a dialog should be routed with rules like
> dispatcher/load balancer/least cost routing/... The requests within
> dialog should be routed based on loose routing.
>
> Of course, one can think of exceptions, but then you should be fully
> aware of what kind of routing you do.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 10/11/16 16:25, Slava Bendersky wrote:
>
> Hello Daniel,
> My setup is proxy all requests to freeswitch via dispatcher.
>
> Slava.
>
> 
> *From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" 
> *To: *"volga629" , "sr-users"
> 
> *Sent: *Thursday, 10 November, 2016 04:56:53
> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] BYE dispatcher
>
> Hello,
>
> as I said before, the registrations have little to do with calls
> in sip, unless there is gruu in use.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 09/11/16 18:07, Slava Bendersky wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
> I cleared registrations and tried again and issue still present.
> Client reply with 481.
>
> IP (tos 0x0, ttl 52, id 7731, offset 0, flags [none], proto
> UDP (17), length 638)
> client_pub_ip.49383 > proxy_pub_ip.llrp: [udp sum ok] UDP,
> length 610
> E..~.3..4...cE.\.j..SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction
> Does Not Exist
> Via:
> SIP/2.0/UDP 
> proxy_pub_ip:5084;branch=z9hG4bK3ea6.0c594485bff5b216f30af0f6172cb2b9.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 
> 10.18.130.24:5160;received=10.18.130.24;rport=5160;branch=z9hG4bKm80c0USSKv5Bp
> From: "Test Extension"
> ;tag=SXt3DQQ90a0Dj
> To: ;tag=719973534
> Call-ID: 1abc150b-2141-1235-b5ad-5254003e39bb
> CSeq: 99019404 BYE
> Supported: replaces, path, eventlist
> User-Agent: Grandstream Wave 1.2.2
> Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, BYE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY,
> INFO, REFER, UPDATE, MESSAGE
> Content-Length: 0
>
> Slava.
>
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy benchmark

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

have you used a single rtpproxy instance? Was there RTP traffic for all
1900 calls? Is this with rtpproxy 1.2 or 2.0?

Cheers,
Daniel


On 14/11/16 10:44, Gholamreza Sabery wrote:
> I managed to create about 1900 concurrent calls using a single
> Kamailio and RTPProxy server. But after this number RTPProxy returns 0
> and the following error is shown in the Kamailio log files:
>
> incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy
> What is the problem here? Also number of file descriptors that
> RTPProxy can use are set to a million.
>
>
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] RTPProxy benchmark

[Gholamreza Sabery]

I managed to create about 1900 concurrent calls using a single Kamailio and
RTPProxy server. But after this number RTPProxy returns 0 and the following
error is shown in the Kamailio log files:

incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy

What is the problem here? Also number of file descriptors that
RTPProxy can use are set to a million.
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users