[SR-Users] Custom header on reply is removed on t_relay

2016-07-18 Thread David Wilson
Hello All, We have a Kamailio proxy (P1) and a custom client (A). Calls are working reliably with A communicating directly with P1. When A sends INVITE to P1, in some cases, we insert a custom header ‘X-Routing’ in the reply. Now, testing with a new, additional proxy (P2) between these two:

Re: [SR-Users] Segfault in 4.1.6

2014-10-08 Thread David Wilson
). Otherwise, yes, a coredump with a gdb backtrace will be very helpful. Cheers, Daniel On 02/10/14 08:31, David Wilson wrote: Hi all, I?ve had Kamailio running nicely for nearly a year, but have hit a segfault twice since upgrading to 4.1.6 earlier this week. The log shows

[SR-Users] Segfault in 4.1.6

2014-10-02 Thread David Wilson
Hi all, I’ve had Kamailio running nicely for nearly a year, but have hit a segfault twice since upgrading to 4.1.6 earlier this week. The log shows: Oct 2 11:28:03 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[1222]: : core [pass_fd.c:293]: receive_fd(): ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 23 Oct 2 11:28:03 localhost

[SR-Users] Setting priority (q) for kamctl ul add

2014-06-24 Thread David Wilson
, On 20/06/14 06:16, David Wilson wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to add a permanent usrloc entry via kamctl ul add. This works, but the created entry has a q value of 1.0 which is higher than I need. Is there a way to either: 1. Specify a q value when using kamctl ul add, or apparently the Q

Re: [SR-Users] Setting priority (q) for kamctl ul add

2014-06-24 Thread David Wilson
Never mind, the missing contact was being removed when a REGISTER was received. In my cfg, I was using: save(location, 0x04) The 0x04 flag, of course, causes all existing entries for the AOR to be removed. Cheers, Dave. On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:45 am, David Wilson d...@zaq.com.au wrote

[SR-Users] Setting priority (q) for kamctl ul add

2014-06-19 Thread David Wilson
Hi All, I'm trying to add a permanent usrloc entry via kamctl ul add. This works, but the created entry has a q value of 1.0 which is higher than I need. Is there a way to either: 1. Specify a q value when using kamctl ul add, or 2. Edit the q value of an existing record by using a kamctl

[SR-Users] Getting Started with SIREMIS

2013-09-19 Thread David Wilson
Hi All, I have Kamailio 4.0.3 installed via APT onto Ubuntu 12.04 and have Siremis 4.0 installed and running nicely. Is there an example config file that demonstrates how to use the features configurable through Siremis? For example, when I populate a UACReg record via Siremis, I had to adapt

Re: [SR-Users] Getting Started with SIREMIS

2013-09-19 Thread David Wilson
, but that doesn't seem to be the case. I'm happy to break out any of these into individual threads, but I've put them all together here to give you an idea of where I'm at. Cheers, Dave. On 20 Sep 2013, at 4:37 am, sr-users-requ...@lists.sip-router.org wrote: Hello, On 9/19/13 9:59 AM, David

[SR-Users] Loose Routing with Cisco router

2013-08-14 Thread David Wilson
Hello All, I'm running Kamailio 4.0.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise). I have SIP messaging flowing nicely, with UACs registering via Kamailio (as a proxy) to a Registrar. Now having problems trying to route messages via a Cisco router (12.4(25g)) using loose routing. The plan is to allow the

Re: [SR-Users] Loose Routing with Cisco router

2013-08-14 Thread David Wilson
to interoperate with cisco gateways/b2bua, they had no problem understanding loose routing added by kamailio. Cheers, Daniel On 8/13/13 10:05 AM, David Wilson wrote: Hello All, I'm running Kamailio 4.0.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise). I have SIP messaging flowing nicely, with UACs

[SR-Users] SER-GettingStarted… update?

2013-05-16 Thread David Wilson
Hi All, One of the most thorough documents I've found for an introduction to Kamailio is the SER-GettingStarted.pdf, but it is now quite dated. Is there an updated version available, or in the works? Cheers, Dave.___ SIP Express Router (SER) and

Re: [SR-Users] xlog/xdbg syntax

2013-04-15 Thread David Wilson
-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Have you loaded pv module? Cheers, Daniel Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com On 15 Apr 2013, at 06:31, David Wilson d...@zaq.com.au wrote: Hi All, Using Kamailio 4.0.0 with a minimal configuration, trying to get

[SR-Users] xlog/xdbg syntax

2013-04-14 Thread David Wilson
Hi All, Using Kamailio 4.0.0 with a minimal configuration, trying to get some logging to help me understand the system, I can get static log messages easily enough with log, but now want something more useful. When I use this route (xdbg example from the tutorial): route { xdbg(SIP

[SR-Users] Kamailio 4.0.0 not listening on TCP

2013-04-12 Thread David Wilson
Hello All, New to Kamailio, I'm running 4.0 on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise). Running from the command line with a minimal config, it tells me that it is listening on port 5060 for both TCP and UDP. I see the same behaviour with the default cfg. However, netstat does not list anything listening on

[SR-Users] Kamailio 4.0.0 not listening on TCP

2013-04-12 Thread David Wilson
From: Jeremy Ardley jeremy.ard...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.0.0 not listening on TCP Have you checked to make sure it's still running? On 12/04/13 14:19, David Wilson wrote: Hello All, New to Kamailio, I'm running 4.0 on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise). Running from

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.0.0 not listening on TCP

2013-04-12 Thread David Wilson
kamailio restart' command appears to work but fails quietly for the following reason Apr 12 14:55:40 sentinel /usr/sbin/kamailio[7501]: ERROR: ctl [ctl.c:379]: ERROR: ctl: could not delete unix socket /tmp/kamailio_ctl: Operation not permitted (1) On 12/04/13 14:37, David Wilson wrote

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 4.0.0 not listening on TCP

2013-04-12 Thread David Wilson
: ctl: could not delete unix socket /tmp/kamailio_ctl: Operation not permitted (1) On 12/04/13 14:37, David Wilson wrote: Hi Jeremy, Thanks for the suggestion, I'm hoping I haven't overlooked something quite that obvious! The last debug output I see on startup is: Listening