Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue kamailio + rtpproxy "481 call leg transaction doesn't exists".

2017-01-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, are you using topoh module? A pcap with all sip messages part of the dialog, from the initial INVITE to the last BYE transaction would be important to have in order to investigate how the headers are changed. Cheers, Daniel On 28/12/2016 13:11, Nihar Ranjan Deb wrote: > > Hi All, > >

Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue kamailio + rtpproxy "481 call leg transaction doesn't exists".

2017-01-09 Thread Nihar Ranjan Deb
Anyone any help on this. Regards, Nihar From: Nihar Ranjan Deb [mailto:nihar.ran...@microtalkgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 5:42 PM To: 'sr-users@lists.sip-router.org' Subject: BYE issue kamailio + rtpproxy "481 call leg transaction doesn't exists". Hi All, I

[SR-Users] BYE issue kamailio + rtpproxy "481 call leg transaction doesn't exists".

2016-12-29 Thread Nihar Ranjan Deb
Hi All, I am a new user of kamailio. We have setup a kamilio server with RTP proxy. Most of the features are working fine except BYE. Say User A and B are registered in kamailio server. A (caller) connected to B(called), call established. 1. If Caller (A) disconnects the call, eve

Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue

2016-10-18 Thread Nelson Migliaro
@lists.sip-router.org] *On > Behalf Of *Nelson Migliaro > *Sent:* 17 October 2016 18:23 > *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Subject:* [SR-Users] BYE issue > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > I am having issues with one SIP vendor. > > > > I have a

Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue

2016-10-18 Thread Phil Lavin
Is it not just the case that the vendor does not support loose routing? -Original Message- From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: 18 October 2016 08:40 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue

Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue

2016-10-18 Thread Alex Balashov
Handling NAT, perhaps, but not correctly. The RURI doesn't change. But not does it have to determine where the request is actually sent on the network and transport layers. -- Alex -- Principal, Evariste Systems LLC (www.evaristesys.com) Sent from my Google Nexus. __

Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue

2016-10-18 Thread Phil Lavin
need to rewrite the headers yourself. From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Nelson Migliaro Sent: 17 October 2016 18:23 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: [SR-Users] BYE issue Hello everybody, I am having issues with one SIP vendor. I have a

Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue

2016-10-17 Thread Alex Balashov
Nelson, You are very correct. The request URI of the BYE (and all other in-dialog requests, such as reinvites) should equal the Contact URI of the party to which it is being sent, and this should not change even if the in-dialog request is being sent through Kamailio because of Record-Route.

[SR-Users] BYE issue

2016-10-17 Thread Nelson Migliaro
Hello everybody, I am having issues with one SIP vendor. I have a Kamailio in bridge mode (private IP / Public IP) and some Asterisk and Media Gateways. Calls get established and I have two way audio but when the remote party hangs up the call, the BYE arrives to the Kamailio and does not move f

[SR-Users] BYE issue - Kamailio +RTP proxy

2014-10-06 Thread balu
Dear experts , I am using kamailio with rtp proxy module. I have 2 questions /issues . 1. When caller or callee ends the call the other end call is not disocnnecting . UA is pjsip based and behind NAT router. Present call flow is pjsipUA (LAN_ip)->Router (Publicip)>Kamailio_with_