[SR-Users] LCR from_uri help

2014-04-28 Thread Juha Heinanen
just to complete this thread, it turned out that from uri matching didn't happen because load_gws() was called without caller uri argument. -- juha ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org

Re: [SR-Users] LCR from_uri help

2014-04-25 Thread Juha Heinanen
Geoffrey Mina writes: > What can I do to debug this? I checked and we aren't seeing any of the > "failed to compile regex" errors in the logs. We have 4 servers that are > all displaying the same behavior (read: ignoring the from_uri match on a > lower priority). you didn't answer if this issue

Re: [SR-Users] LCR from_uri help

2014-04-25 Thread Geoffrey Mina
Juha, Thank you for all of your help so far, but we are still totally stuck trying to make this work. We have double and triple checked our configuration, database, and INVITE and everything is in-line with what previously worked (in 1.5). We are running 4.1.3, is that what you were testing on?

Re: [SR-Users] LCR from_uri help

2014-04-23 Thread Juha Heinanen
Geoffrey Mina writes: > Right now, I would think that with our Priority of 0 on the route with the > from_URI match, the algorithm should always look at that one first and > route the calls accordingly. > > Since we have the priority correctly set to evaluate in the order we want, > what next can

Re: [SR-Users] LCR from_uri help

2014-04-22 Thread Geoffrey Mina
OK, has this behavior changed since Kamailio 1.5 because this previously worked. Right now, I would think that with our Priority of 0 on the route with the from_URI match, the algorithm should always look at that one first and route the calls accordingly. Since we have the priority correctly set

Re: [SR-Users] LCR from_uri help

2014-04-22 Thread Juha Heinanen
Geoffrey Mina writes: > OK. WE have made a change so that the priority is 0 for the route that has > the from_uri. We are still not seeing this route get matched > properly. i tried to say that from uri plays no role in your lcr setup, because +1 matches both rules 31 and 5. if you want it mat

Re: [SR-Users] LCR from_uri help

2014-04-22 Thread Geoffrey Mina
OK. WE have made a change so that the priority is 0 for the route that has the from_uri. We are still not seeing this route get matched properly. Here is what the INVITE looks like: INVITE sip:+19137274555@1.2.3.4:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5b52e524;rport From: "20

[SR-Users] LCR from_uri help

2014-04-21 Thread Juha Heinanen
Geoffrey Mina writes: > The LCR module is behaving in a way that is inconsistent with our old 1.5 > versions. We have a customer that passes a certain caller-id. That > from_uri should be routing over a specific trunk. Here are the relevant > bits of the LCR data from kamcmd. > > I would expec

[SR-Users] LCR from_uri help

2014-04-21 Thread Geoffrey Mina
Greetings, I need a little help with the LCR module. I am running Kamailio 4.1.2. The LCR module is behaving in a way that is inconsistent with our old 1.5 versions. We have a customer that passes a certain caller-id. That from_uri should be routing over a specific trunk. Here are the relevant