@lists.sip-router.org
*Sent: *Tuesday, April 1, 2014 8:40:58 PM
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] message 484
I think you should remove this section: or comment it, its behavior is not
the one we want at this moment.
---
if (is_method(OPTIONS) || allow_trusted($si,$(proto))) { #if
(is_method
-router.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 8:40:58 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484
I think you should remove this section: or comment it, its behavior is not the
one we want at this moment.
---
if (is_method(OPTIONS) || allow_trusted($si,$(proto))) { #if
(is_method(OPTIONS
Hello Pedro,
I just come back on line.
If i remove this line I start getting
- Original Message -
From: Pedro Niño nino.pe...@gmail.com
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 8:40:58 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 8:40:58 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484
I think you should remove this section: or comment it, its behavior is not the
one we want at this moment.
---
if (is_method(OPTIONS) || allow_trusted($si,$(proto
: [SR-Users] message 484
So, the problem is that calls made from a direct connected user, falls to
voicemail? Even if the other user is online?
All the users are on the same asterisk server? Or using a trunk outside?
As a test, tried to register to the asterisk server directly and test
: *Monday, March 31, 2014 9:51:11 AM
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] message 484
So, the problem is that calls made from a direct connected user, falls to
voicemail? Even if the other user is online?
All the users are on the same asterisk server? Or using a trunk outside?
As a test, tried to register
Hi!
I guess this is a poorly configured Asterisk server that has Allowoverlap
enabled.
A 484 is used for overlap dialing. The server says I need more digits to
complete this call.
/O
On 31 Mar 2014, at 02:30, Pedro Niño nino.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is the correct behavior, as
to voicemail.
Slva.
- Original Message -
From: Olle E. Johansson o...@edvina.net
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:33:11 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484
Hi!
I guess this is a poorly configured Asterisk
@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:33:11 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484
Hi!
I guess this is a poorly configured Asterisk server that has Allowoverlap
enabled.
A 484 is used for overlap dialing. The server says I need more digits to
complete this call.
/O
On 31 Mar 2014
*To: *Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
*Sent: *Monday, March 31, 2014 3:33:11 AM
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] message 484
Hi!
I guess this is a poorly configured Asterisk server that has
Allowoverlap enabled.
A 484 is used for overlap dialing. The server says I
...@gmail.com
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:51:11 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484
So, the problem is that calls made from a direct connected user, falls to
voicemail? Even if the other user is online?
All the users
-
From: Pedro Niño nino.pe...@gmail.com
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:51:11 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484
So, the problem is that calls made from a direct connected user, falls to
voicemail? Even if the other
I think this is the correct behavior, as asterisk server is complaining
about the address/request not containing all the necesary data to process
the message
Can you please elaborate with a bit more of detail? Also can use tools
like sngrep, tcpdump (or wireshark) to have a better view of the
30, 2014 8:30:56 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484
I think this is the correct behavior, as asterisk server is complaining about
the address/request not containing all the necesary data to process the message
Can you please elaborate with a bit more of detail? Also can use tools like
.
--
*From: *Pedro Niño nino.pe...@gmail.com
*To: *Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
*Sent: *Sunday, March 30, 2014 8:30:56 PM
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] message 484
I think this is the correct behavior, as asterisk server is complaining
about
Mailing List
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
*Sent: *Sunday, March 30, 2014 8:30:56 PM
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] message 484
I think this is the correct behavior, as asterisk server is complaining
about the address/request not containing all the necesary data to process
the message
Can you
OPTIONS.
Server: kamailio (4.1.2 (x86_64/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
Slava.
- Original Message -
From: Pedro Niño nino.pe...@gmail.com
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 10:04:30 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484
.
--
*From: *Pedro Niño nino.pe...@gmail.com
*To: *Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
*Sent: *Sunday, March 30, 2014 10:04:30 PM
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] message 484
Ok, I wonder
If this is a message you're seeing at the asterisk server, it may
List sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 11:20:50 PM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] message 484
Just be aware, with this any options message from anybody will be answered with
ok.
I would prefer to make it specific, at least to be sure that only happens when
the source
Hello Everyone,
How to correct message 484
Is need use txt module to fill string with correct information ?
--- SIP read from UDP:192.168.100.145:5060 ---
SIP/2.0 484 Address Incomplete
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.100.145:5062;branch=z9hG4bK5ec564e6
From: asterisk
20 matches
Mail list logo
