Re: [SR-Users] Setup IMS core Network When Network behind nat

Hello, do you want the entire platform to be behind a single public ip, or each node in the network to run on a private ip but have also a public ip associated? Cheers, Daniel On 11.07.17 11:31, Mojtaba wrote: > Hello, I am working on IMS core network. In this network we have these > node with

Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy - lookup request failed

Hi Daniel, we are using 1.2.1-2.1 version from Debian Jessie repository. rtpproxy1.2.1-2.1 amd64Relay for Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) media streams Regards, Marian Dňa 11.7.2017 o 13:09 Daniel-Constantin Mierla napísal(a): > >

Re: [SR-Users] New Diameter IMS Module : can we use it as SWx interface

Hi, you can basically implement any Diameter Application (or Emulation) using my Diameter-Server module. I use it for an HSS and I wanted to use it for an PCRF Emulator emulating the Rx-Interface, if time allows Thanks, Carsten 2017-07-06 19:12 GMT+02:00 Igor Potjevlesch

[SR-Users] RTPProxy - lookup request failed

Hello, I have a problem with RTPProxy. Scenario: SS7 (PSTN) ---> ASTERISK BOX --> Kamailio --> UAC In case of incoming call from PSTN, when called party answer the call after 60 seconds of ringing, then the call is without audio and in this case I see in the log this message: Creating session

Re: [SR-Users] Setup IMS core Network When Network behind nat

Hi. I found where was my problem. I had a misunderestanding. I used public domaim as outbound proxy and i could register to ims. On 11 Jul 2017 15:00, "Mojtaba" wrote: > Hi Daniel. > Let me describe more clearly the network. Let me suppose these > configurations: > Private IMS

Re: [SR-Users] RTPProxy - lookup request failed

Hello, thank you for quick reply, I tried to find some options in the man pages, but I didn't read HOWITWORKS section. I will try to compile RTPProxy from source. Regards Marian Dňa 11.7.2017 o 15:36 Daniel-Constantin Mierla napísal(a): > > Hello, > > doing 'man rtpproxy' on debian jessie

[SR-Users] Setup IMS core Network When Network behind nat

Hello, I am working on IMS core network. In this network we have these node with private IP: P-CSCF: 192.168.100.101(pcscf.kamailio-ims.test) I-CSCF: 192.168.100.102(icscf.kamailio-ims.test) S-CSCF: 192.168.100.103(scscf.kamailio-ims.test) HSS: 192.168.100.200(hss.kamailio-ims.test) I have two

Re: [SR-Users] Database connection handles vs. processes

I do use sqlops extensively, both in the main processes and rtimer processes. Does that make a difference? On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 02:49:19AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:41:24AM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > > are the connections to the same database or

Re: [SR-Users] Siremis updates

Hello, as a further update, 3) has been pushed to the repo, therefore be careful if you want to do an upgrade to an existing installation, fresh installs should just work as usual. Cheers, Daniel On 06.07.17 15:08, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > there is some ongoing work on

Re: [SR-Users] Database connection handles vs. processes

Hello, On 11.07.17 08:49, Alex Balashov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:41:24AM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> are the connections to the same database or to different databases? Even >> on the same server, the database name matters. > Hi, > > Same database, same server, same

Re: [SR-Users] Database connection handles vs. processes

No -- if the database url is the same, sqlops should reuse existing connections. Cheers, Daniel On 11.07.17 08:57, Alex Balashov wrote: > I do use sqlops extensively, both in the main processes and rtimer > processes. Does that make a difference? > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 02:49:19AM -0400,

Re: [SR-Users] Database connection handles vs. processes

On 11.07.17 09:13, Alex Balashov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> On 11.07.17 08:49, Alex Balashov wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:41:24AM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>> are the connections to the same

Re: [SR-Users] Database connection handles vs. processes

Hello, are the connections to the same database or to different databases? Even on the same server, the database name matters. Cheers, Daniel On 10.07.17 22:23, Alex Balashov wrote: > Hi, > > By way of illustration, I have one server with children=8, a single UDP > listener, and 23 processes

Re: [SR-Users] Database connection handles vs. processes

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:41:24AM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > are the connections to the same database or to different databases? Even > on the same server, the database name matters. Hi, Same database, same server, same database name. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste

Re: [SR-Users] Database connection handles vs. processes

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > > On 11.07.17 08:49, Alex Balashov wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 08:41:24AM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > > >> are the connections to the same database or to different databases? Even > >>