Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK's

2018-11-30 Thread Dan Quinney
Hi Alex, Thanks for that, I’ve been reading the RFC but clearly missed the bit about section 13. Dan > On 30 Nov 2018, at 15:10, Alex Balashov wrote: > > Hi, > > Note that there are two different kinds of ACKs. An ACK for a 2xx > transaction is an in-dialog request that follows the rules

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with ACK's

2018-11-30 Thread Alex Balashov
Hi, Note that there are two different kinds of ACKs. An ACK for a 2xx transaction is an in-dialog request that follows the rules for Section 13, and having two Via hops in one of those is entirely appropriate. On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:59:52PM +, Dan Quinney wrote: > Hi all, > > I’m

Re: [SR-Users] core at kamailio 5.1.6

2018-11-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you test with the patch from the next commit?   - https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/39b89a18a8c357151a173ab02dc95dff1f02715d There is a similar issue on github tracker and eventually the patch deals with both cases. Might have been an issue caused by a delayed processing

Re: [SR-Users] Response VIA Header

2018-11-30 Thread Soltanici Ilie
Hi, In the ACK received after 200 OK the parameter 'receiving' is missing as well. What I observed is that to some ISP Kamailio is sending back 'received' parameter, but for some of them - is not sending. See below an invite where Kamailio is setting back 'received' parameter in via response:

Re: [SR-Users] Response VIA Header

2018-11-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, rport in top Via of the incoming request indicates that the sender whats received parameter in the response. If not, it should not be added. However, if source ip is different that the Via IP of the incoming request and you use force_rport() in kamailio.cfg, then kamailio should add the

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio v5.2.0 Released - new major version is out

2018-11-30 Thread Samuel F .
Great work everyone on this release and thank you Daniel for pushing the project forward and handling the releases! All the best, Samuel From: sr-users on behalf of Daniel-Constantin Mierla Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 14:18 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users

Re: [SR-Users] Automating installation

2018-11-30 Thread Samuel F .
We run Ansible with great success. We use Ansible to provision the server and keep all Kamailio related code in a git-repo. Ansible has two tasks, (1) to provision the server according to business security standards and all sub-deps, and (2) to update the server when new code is commited to the

[SR-Users] Dialplan Module limits

2018-11-30 Thread Enrico Bandiera
Hi guys, does anyone know which are the limits of the diaplan module? After how many entries I will encounter serious performance issues? Thanks, Enrico. ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio v5.2.0 Released - new major version is out

2018-11-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Thanks! Lots of credits go to the developers and community members helping to bring this new major release out! Cheers, Daniel On 30.11.18 09:03, Samuel F. wrote: > Great work everyone on this release and thank you Daniel for pushing > the project forward and handling the releases! > > All

[SR-Users] core at kamailio 5.1.6

2018-11-30 Thread David Escartín
hello all we are seeing in a new kamailio instance some crashes. We are not sure the root cause, here you have the last core generated https://pastebin.com/xMRrug2X COuld you please take a look to see if there might be any issue with the last message that caused the core (to me seems

[SR-Users] Issue with ACK's

2018-11-30 Thread Dan Quinney
Hi all, I’m having some issues with ACK’s. Specifically, when an ACK reaches Kamailio from either Asterisk or an endpoint, Kamailio is adding a second Via header - which isn’t valid as per RFC 3261 (17.1.1.3); “The ACK MUST contain a single Via header field, and this MUST be equal