Re: [SR-Users] subnet match

To conclude this discussion, I just pushed a commit to master branch that masks also the value of the subnet address parameter. There was also a github enhancement request in the tracker related to the same topic. Cheers, Daniel On 14.03.18 16:56, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > Hi Hugh, >

Re: [SR-Users] subnet match

Hello Daniel, Thank you the following worked. Slava. On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Based on what Hugh found, you need to use subnet masked address, so try like: if(!is_in_subnet("$si", "$(dd{s.select,0,.}).$(dd{s.select,1,.}).0.0/16"))

Re: [SR-Users] subnet match

Based on what Hugh found, you need to use subnet masked address, so try like: if(!is_in_subnet("$si", "$(dd{s.select,0,.}).$(dd{s.select,1,.}).0.0/16")) { Cheers, Daniel On 14.03.18 15:28, volga...@networklab.ca wrote: > I tried /30, /32, /24 none of them works. > > Slava. > > On Wed, Mar 14,

Re: [SR-Users] subnet match

If you set debug=3 and these are all log messages you got, then the debug level is diverted to another file by your syslog configuration. You should see a lot of log messages with "DEBUG" inside them. Cheers, Daniel On 14.03.18 14:21, volga...@networklab.ca wrote: > in debug in level 3 or 4 not

Re: [SR-Users] subnet match

Hi, It looks from the code that the subnet IP address must be masked. https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/modules/ipops/ipops_mod.c#L393 if ((ip->s_addr & ipv4_mask) == net_addr.s_addr) return 1; return 0; So 10.1.1.0/24 will match 10.1.1.241 but 10.1.1.128/24 will NOT match

Re: [SR-Users] subnet match

I tried /30, /32, /24 none of them works. Slava. On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, maybe it is what Hugh said in his response, respectively that the subnet needs to have the lowest bits masked. Can you run with debug=3? Maybe ipops

Re: [SR-Users] subnet match

in debug in level 3 or 4 not providing any useful messages. Mar 14 14:10:20 prx00 kamailio[1414]: {2 2 INVITE 143678_rel51ZGUyMTI5YWE0Y2Q3OWIzYWQ4NmMyYmM2ZWI0M2IyYmE} 5(1421) exec: *** cfgtrace:failure_route=[NATMANAGE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=807 a=26 n=is_in_subnet Mar 14 14:10:20

Re: [SR-Users] subnet match

Hello, maybe it is what Hugh said in his response, respectively that the subnet needs to have the lowest bits masked. Can you run with debug=3? Maybe ipops module writes more debug message to track it. Cheers, Daniel On 14.03.18 13:33, volga...@networklab.ca wrote: > Hello Daniel, > I

Re: [SR-Users] subnet match

Hello, On 14.03.18 00:19, volga...@networklab.ca wrote: > Hello Everyone, > Not sure what I am missing, but can't match ip address to subnet > > Log says > >  INFO:

Re: [SR-Users] subnet match

Hi, The log message doesn't quite match your code sample. The code puts the subnet into the log, but your output does not have the /16 (in red below). Could you repeat and print all the avp's before and after is-in-subnet()? I can't remember if the subnet needs to have the lowest bits masked, but

[SR-Users] subnet match

Hello Everyone, Not sure what I am missing, but can't match ip address to subnet Log says INFO: