Re: [SR-Users] Core dump on diameter CCR request

Thank you for your reply. Daniel, Here is the full backtrace of Kamailio. Full_backtrace.txt Carsten, I am using the latest kamailio git master branch. version: kamailio 5.3.0-dev0 (x86_64/linux) 37c2e5 Mojtaba,

Re: [SR-Users] Core dump on diameter CCR request

Thank you for your reply. Daniel, Here is the full backtrace of Kamailio. Full_backtrace.txt Carsten, I am using the latest kamailio git master branch. version: kamailio 5.3.0-dev0 (x86_64/linux) 37c2e5 Mojtaba,

Re: [SR-Users] Core dump on diameter CCR request

Thank you for your reply. Daniel, Here is the full backtrace of Kamailio. Full_backtrace.txt Carsten, I am using the latest kamailio git master branch. version: kamailio 5.3.0-dev0 (x86_64/linux) 37c2e5 Mojtaba,

Re: [SR-Users] Core dump on diameter CCR request

Thank you for your reply. Daniel, Here is the full backtrace of Kamailio. Full_backtrace.txt Carsten, I am using the latest kamailio git master branch. version: kamailio 5.3.0-dev0 (x86_64/linux) 37c2e5 Mojtaba,

Re: [SR-Users] Core dump on diameter CCR request

Hi, Also, what version of Kamailio are you using? Thanks, Carsten Am Mo., 12. Nov. 2018, 09:50 hat Mojtaba geschrieben: > Hello, > We developed OCS based on these module in Kamailio: ims_charging, > ims_ocs, ims_dimameter_server and worker process written in Q_HSS. We > have not this issue.

Re: [SR-Users] Core dump on diameter CCR request

Hello, We developed OCS based on these module in Kamailio: ims_charging, ims_ocs, ims_dimameter_server and worker process written in Q_HSS. We have not this issue. Are you sure ims_charging is connected to any ocs proccess like ims_ocs? Because CCR/CCA and other related message is transfered

Re: [SR-Users] Core dump on diameter CCR request

Hello, get the full backtrace with gdb from the core file -- it should reveal where the crash happened. Also, it might be good to open an issue in bug tracker from github.com/kamailio/kamailio in order to track it properly. Cheers, Daniel On 11.11.18 12:52, Venkatesh Macha wrote: > Hi all, >