Daniel,
I appreciate the information. Than you very much.
Karthik
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> you have to put this from the perspective of: changes to the SIP message
> (headers and body) are not immediately reflected. So even if you do a
> re
Hello,
you have to put this from the perspective of: changes to the SIP message
(headers and body) are not immediately reflected. So even if you do a
replace or subst operation, changes are not visible. If you do
remove_hf() or append_hf(), it happens the same.
The FAQ has an entry for it:
-
h
or rather a list of the pseudo vars that fall under the special case;
assuming this list is smaller.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Karthik Srinivasan
wrote:
> Henning,
>
> Thanks for the explanation. This does clear it up for me.
>
> Do you happen to know if there is a list of pseudo vars t
Henning,
Thanks for the explanation. This does clear it up for me.
Do you happen to know if there is a list of pseudo vars that fall under the
non special case? (a list for those psedo vars where msg_apply_changes
needs to be called for the update to be reflected while in routing file
processi
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018, 20:28:13 CEST schrieb Alex Balashov:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:26:07PM -0500, Karthik Srinivasan wrote:
> > Could you explain why we need to call this function when manipulating $fU
> > ?
>
> Some PV manipulations work that way, others don't. :-) "Because
> Kamailio"
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:26:07PM -0500, Karthik Srinivasan wrote:
> Could you explain why we need to call this function when manipulating $fU ?
Some PV manipulations work that way, others don't. :-) "Because
Kamailio".
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800
Alex,
You are correct. msg_apply_changes works.
I am a bit confused on why this is so. I have manipulated $rU for example
without having to call msg_apply_changes.
Could you explain why we need to call this function when manipulating $fU ?
Thanks,
Karthik
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:44 PM
You may need to run msg_apply_changes() before this change is
immediately visible in route script.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:45:19PM -0500, Karthik Srinivasan wrote:
> From the online documentation:$fU - From URI username
>
> *$fU* - reference to username in URI of 'From' header
>
> It is R/W
