Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy/rtpengine. Help to understand.

2016-12-22 Thread Igor Olhovskiy 
Yep, logs helps. Actually, was mix of errors in PBX and Kamailio config.
So yea, rtpproxy is working as expected, can’t say same for my config files :)

Regards, Igor

On 22 дек. 2016 г., 19:24 +0200, Alex Balashov , 
wrote:
> That just sounds like the rtpproxy is not being engaged, i.e. that the 
> rtpproxy_manage() call is failing. When that happens, the SDP from .2 will be 
> passed through unaltered.
>
> The Kamailio log should give you some idea of why the rtpproxy invocation has 
> failed.
>
> RTPProxy is certainly not limited to RFC 1918 addresses or any particular 
> network characteristics.
>
> -- Alex
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy/rtpengine. Help to understand.

2016-12-22 Thread Alex Balashov 
Oh, I see. Yes, that could be. 

-- Alex

> On Dec 22, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Daniel Tryba  wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:23:52PM -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> That just sounds like the rtpproxy is not being engaged, i.e. that the
>> rtpproxy_manage() call is failing. When that happens, the SDP from .2
>> will be passed through unaltered.
>> 
>> The Kamailio log should give you some idea of why the rtpproxy
>> invocation has failed.
> 
> I'd guess rtpproxy_manage() isn't failing, it just isn't called since
> dialplan logic is only instructed to do this for natted stuff. Since the
> source ip and SDP both contain the same ip the assumption is that
> rtpproxy is not needed.
> 
> 
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy/rtpengine. Help to understand.

2016-12-22 Thread Daniel Tryba 
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:23:52PM -0500, Alex Balashov wrote:
> That just sounds like the rtpproxy is not being engaged, i.e. that the
> rtpproxy_manage() call is failing. When that happens, the SDP from .2
> will be passed through unaltered.
> 
> The Kamailio log should give you some idea of why the rtpproxy
> invocation has failed.

I'd guess rtpproxy_manage() isn't failing, it just isn't called since
dialplan logic is only instructed to do this for natted stuff. Since the
source ip and SDP both contain the same ip the assumption is that
rtpproxy is not needed.


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy/rtpengine. Help to understand.

2016-12-22 Thread Alex Balashov 
That just sounds like the rtpproxy is not being engaged, i.e. that the 
rtpproxy_manage() call is failing. When that happens, the SDP from .2 will be 
passed through unaltered.

The Kamailio log should give you some idea of why the rtpproxy invocation has 
failed.

RTPProxy is certainly not limited to RFC 1918 addresses or any particular 
network characteristics.

-- Alex
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy/rtpengine. Help to understand.

2016-12-22 Thread Igor Olhovskiy 
Sorry,  I got media address 111.222.3.2 in SDP, but not 111.222.3.3

Regards, Igor

On 22 дек. 2016 г., 19:19 +0200, Igor Olhovskiy , 
wrote:
> Hi!
> Issue I can’t figure out. Or all working ok and that’s just me who not 
> understands.
>
> I have situation
> softPhone (111.222.3.2) -> Kamailio w. rtpproxy (111.222.3.3) -> PBX 
> (111.222.3.4)
> All addresses are on same public network.
> rtpproxy is running with -l 111.222.3.3 -A 111.222.3.3
> I want all media goes through rtpproxy. So, in INVITE and ACK I call 
> rtpproxy_manage().
> But according to sip packets on PBX (10.0.0.4) I got media address 10.0.0.2 
> in SDP, but not 10.0.0.3
>
> If I use scheme, where client in some other NATted network (like 
> 192.168.1.100), all is replaced correctly (means rtpproxy_manage() is working)
>
> So, I can’t understand, rtpproxy_manage() changes only rfc1918 addresses or 
> I’m missing something?
> If any - can provide pcap’s with both cases.
>
> Regards, Igor
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] rtpproxy/rtpengine. Help to understand.

2016-12-22 Thread Igor Olhovskiy 
Hi!
Issue I can’t figure out. Or all working ok and that’s just me who not 
understands.

I have situation
softPhone (111.222.3.2) -> Kamailio w. rtpproxy (111.222.3.3) -> PBX 
(111.222.3.4)
All addresses are on same public network.
rtpproxy is running with -l 111.222.3.3 -A 111.222.3.3
I want all media goes through rtpproxy. So, in INVITE and ACK I call 
rtpproxy_manage().
But according to sip packets on PBX (10.0.0.4) I got media address 10.0.0.2 in 
SDP, but not 10.0.0.3

If I use scheme, where client in some other NATted network (like 
192.168.1.100), all is replaced correctly (means rtpproxy_manage() is working)

So, I can’t understand, rtpproxy_manage() changes only rfc1918 addresses or I’m 
missing something?
If any - can provide pcap’s with both cases.

Regards, Igor
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users