-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2009 01:09 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 13:01 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> Change the identification sense against DP too like I did in the
>> previous patches against the monitor.
>
> Patch did not apply on master after the l
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 13:01 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Change the identification sense against DP too like I did in the
> previous patches against the monitor.
Patch did not apply on master after the last push, attaching a fixed
patch.
Simo.
0001-Change-the-why-DP-clients-identify.patch
Descrip
Change the identification sense against DP too like I did in the
previous patches against the monitor.
Simo.
0001-Change-the-why-DP-clients-identify.patch
Description: application/mbox
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2009 06:10 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:32 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> I realized I mistakenly attached the wrong patch to the previous
>> email.
>> The correct patch is attached.
>
> ack.
>
> Simo.
>
> __
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2009 12:24 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 10:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Our configuration specifies the monitor config timeout as seconds,
>> but we were passing it directly to dbus commands that require
>> millisecon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2009 12:18 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 08/11/2009 12:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> Attached new 0002 patch with the included fixes.
>> Ooops patch was buggy, sent int tried to read string (thanks Steve :)
>
>> New one attached.
>
>> Sim
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 10:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Our configuration specifies the monitor config timeout as seconds,
> but we were passing it directly to dbus commands that require
> milliseconds. Fixing this in get_monitor_config(). Also, the
> default value of -1 for the timeout r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2009 12:08 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> Attached new 0002 patch with the included fixes.
>
> Ooops patch was buggy, sent int tried to read string (thanks Steve :)
>
> New one attached.
>
> Simo.
>
>
> -
> Attached new 0002 patch with the included fixes.
Ooops patch was buggy, sent int tried to read string (thanks Steve :)
New one attached.
Simo.
0002-Change-services-identification-mechanism.patch
Description: application/mbox
___
sssd-devel mailing
Our configuration specifies the monitor config timeout as seconds,
but we were passing it directly to dbus commands that require
milliseconds. Fixing this in get_monitor_config(). Also, the
default value of -1 for the timeout resulted in a timeout much too
short to be useful, so I'm making it 10s i
Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 08/10/2009 08:27 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Ack. Waiting for a reply from Jakub as well before pushing these
> patches.
>
> Patch 0001 (INI fix): ACK
>
> Patch 0002 (ELAPI): I have some comments and questions. Most of them are
> just style comments, but I think at lea
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 08:41 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Patch 0002:
> Minor typo in client_registration: regeistration should be
> registration
ok
> Coding standard for dbus methods suggest the more readable:
> ret = dbus_message_append_args(reply,
>DBUS_TYPE
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 15:04 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>
> 4) In general (this is maybe question also for the others not a review
> item), is there a reason for passing the macros containing
> configure-time variables as -DMACRO instead of using
> AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED
> and pulling them out of conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2009 08:27 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Ack. Waiting for a reply from Jakub as well before pushing these patches.
Patch 0001 (INI fix): ACK
Patch 0002 (ELAPI): I have some comments and questions. Most of them are
just style comments, but I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/11/2009 06:52 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> The following 3 patches changes the way services are started up and
> identify themselves to the monitor.
>
> The first patch is just minor or cosmetic fixes.
>
> The second patch changes the identification
The following 3 patches changes the way services are started up and
identify themselves to the monitor.
The first patch is just minor or cosmetic fixes.
The second patch changes the identification from monitor initiated to
service initiated and acked by the monitor. This allows the service to
per
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:32 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> I realized I mistakenly attached the wrong patch to the previous
> email.
> The correct patch is attached.
ack.
Simo.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https:/
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 17:22 -0400, Mathias Gug wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 08/07/2009 10:40 AM, Miguel P.C. wrote:
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >>> International testing is always a good thing
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> As the subject implies, I think we need a branch policy in the SSSD to
> address things like the recent security update that we released for
> 0.4.1. Currently there is no obvious way
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 13:59 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> When the backends start up, the monitor was immediately sending a
> getIdentity request. However, as we've added more processing to
> the initialization routines over time, we started introducing
> latency between when we open the connec
20 matches
Mail list logo
