On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:00:36AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>
>
> On 11/25/2015 01:16 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> >
> >Hi Pavel,
> >
> >thank you for the suggestions. I did both changes, although I did the
> >first a bit differently. I didn't like the separate return as well but
> >originally
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:41:16AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:48:29AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > Attached.
> >
>
> > From 845fa8d3cf904f4d237527f371666ce4a5e21400 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?=
> > Date:
On 11/27/2015 10:06 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:06:03PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
attached patch proposes solution for leaking memory when non-existing netgroup
is looked up.
1st patch is just for testing - just call 'pkill -SIGUSR1 sssd_nss' and talloc
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:57:56PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 11/12/2015 06:04 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:54:21PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>>On 11/11/2015 02:42 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi, I think it's a good idea to only say we don't handle services for
>
On 11/27/2015 09:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:57:49AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 11/25/2015 09:48 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:18:18PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:09:41PM -, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
Note: man page
On 11/25/2015 01:16 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi Pavel,
thank you for the suggestions. I did both changes, although I did the
first a bit differently. I didn't like the separate return as well but
originally was too lazy to rename 'fail' to 'done'.
New version attached.
bye,
Sumit
Thanks,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:06:03PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> attached patch proposes solution for leaking memory when non-existing
> netgroup is looked up.
>
> 1st patch is just for testing - just call 'pkill -SIGUSR1 sssd_nss' and
> talloc report will be generated in
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:57:49AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 11/25/2015 09:48 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:18:18PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:09:41PM -, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> >>>Note: man page says:
> >>>...
> >>>When autofs
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:41:36PM -0500, Dan Lavu wrote:
> I think linking contribute makes more sense as it actually contains build
> instructions, but I don't see any harm in adding both.
>
I still had trouble applying the patch from the mail, but hopefully I
reconstructed it well:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:31:10PM -0500, Dan Lavu wrote:
> Arguably just 'git diff' is the git formatted way, =D
> but here you go.
We prefer to attach the output of git-format-patch to the e-mail :-)
>
> From 8b2d160abbf6eb6ff894ddb2e687983168d1da51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dan Lavu
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:48:29AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> Attached.
>
> From 845fa8d3cf904f4d237527f371666ce4a5e21400 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?=
> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:47:58 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] man sssd-ad: fix typo
>
11 matches
Mail list logo