On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 18:40 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/03/16 11:29), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 16:58 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (04/03/16 16:42), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> >On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 21:27 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >> On (02/03/16 10:02),
On (07/03/16 11:29), Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 16:58 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (04/03/16 16:42), Simo Sorce wrote:
>> >On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 21:27 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (02/03/16 10:02), Simo Sorce wrote:
>> >> >On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 15:34 +0100, Lukas
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 16:58 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (04/03/16 16:42), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 21:27 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (02/03/16 10:02), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> >On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 15:34 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >> On (01/03/16 18:28),
On (04/03/16 16:42), Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 21:27 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (02/03/16 10:02), Simo Sorce wrote:
>> >On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 15:34 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (01/03/16 18:28), Simo Sorce wrote:
>> >> >On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 18:22 -0500, Simo
ehlo,
Attached patch should speed up build a little bit.
But the main purspose is to sipmplify src/tests/cwrap/Makefile.am
LS
>From dd85774c081ff4ae1f1eb968018b8396c56232b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:39:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH]
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 05:09:00PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:13:40PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:03:32PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:45:21AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:26:34AM
ehlo,
simple patch is attached.
LS
>From 1a6bb8a3adf99bdc0b81202c568c56302ebdf9ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:59:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel
libcmocka and cwrap is available in epel
which is
On 03/07/2016 01:53 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/07/2016 01:11 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/02/2016 05:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi all,
attached two patches resolve [1]. This ticket has design page [2].
In my opinion it could be fine to have tests on sysdb_sudo. I have
started write some,
On 03/07/2016 01:11 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hi,
see comments inline.
errno_t sysdb_search_sudo_rules(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
struct sss_domain_info *domain,
const char *sub_filter,
const char **attrs,
On 03/03/2016 02:15 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/03/2016 02:00 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi,
I found an interesting thing. I wonder if this is a bug or not. I tried
to write a test for sysdb_sudo_store() function:
# src/db/sysdb_sudo.h
errno_t
sysdb_sudo_store (struct * sss_domain_info domain,
On 03/07/2016 01:11 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 03/02/2016 05:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi all,
attached two patches resolve [1]. This ticket has design page [2].
In my opinion it could be fine to have tests on sysdb_sudo. I have
started write some, but there were troubles with memory leak.
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:33:38PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/03/16 12:12), Pavel Březina wrote:
> >On 03/07/2016 10:14 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>ehlo,
> >>
> >>simple aptch is attached.
> >
> >When there, can you also talloc_free(attrs) on error? Thanks.
> See updated patch
>
>
On (07/03/16 12:12), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 03/07/2016 10:14 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>ehlo,
>>
>>simple aptch is attached.
>
>When there, can you also talloc_free(attrs) on error? Thanks.
See updated patch
LS
>From 7e70c88277d7ae3f7b953af51da4e97917923fda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On (07/03/16 12:48), Pavel Březina wrote:
>I'm just reviewing Petr's sudo rule invalidation patches and when I hit
>
>>+case TYPE_SUDO_RULE:
>>+type_string = "sudo_rule";
>>+#ifdef BUILD_SUDO
>>+ret = sysdb_search_sudo_rules(ctx, dinfo,
>>+
On 03/02/2016 05:04 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi all,
attached two patches resolve [1]. This ticket has design page [2].
In my opinion it could be fine to have tests on sysdb_sudo. I have
started write some, but there were troubles with memory leak. Maybe I
haven't understood necessary logic
I'm just reviewing Petr's sudo rule invalidation patches and when I hit
+case TYPE_SUDO_RULE:
+type_string = "sudo_rule";
+#ifdef BUILD_SUDO
+ret = sysdb_search_sudo_rules(ctx, dinfo,
+ filter, attrs, _count, );
+#else /* BUILD_SUDO */
+
On 03/07/2016 10:14 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
simple aptch is attached.
When there, can you also talloc_free(attrs) on error? Thanks.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
One way to fix this would be to revert:
f58ffb26aeaae0642a149643672fa59ec01a3a36
1476d5348fcf387e7481d833becbd993d91f8019
These patches simplified the entryUSN fitler from (&(entryUSN >=
$last)(entryUSN != $last)) to (entryUSN >= $last + 1). This was
requested by Thierry to improve
ehlo,
We do not have the "include" directory in git
and such directory is not generated by autotools in
build directory either.
LS
>From af446928a2a18ebc17f17f33a2563dd2dd0c637c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 19:05:46 +0100
Subject:
ehlo,
There are new warnings with gcc-6.0
LS
>From 2561af75f5d0ccff51ed8f88a48fb685b83e91e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 15:15:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] UTIL: Fix indentation in dlinklist.h
---
src/util/dlinklist.h | 130
ehlo,
simple aptch is attached.
LS
>From b0f5ccffb400d6dc8b23208239adc6522b0622c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 18:57:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] TOOLS: Prevent dereference of null pointer
VAR_CHECK is called with (var, EOK, ...)
EOK
21 matches
Mail list logo