Hello,
this patch resolves [1]. This adds new behaviour of negative caching of
locals, so it needs new tests. I will send patch with tests soon, but
not today.
It is applicable after
RESPONDERS: Negcache in resp_ctx [2].
For clarity, there is branch with all negative cache's patches [3].
Ubuntu systems use "unity" as their screen-locker. Without this in the defaults,
people often get locked out of their machines when the screen locks.
Resolves:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1578415
From dac0f10e3e5139cfd378d52c8e57659629f3ba6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On 05/05/2016 12:08 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hello,
this patch set moves negative cache from particular context of given
responder to common context resp_ctx.
It is reaction on Fix taloc context for negative cache [1]. And it
replaces it.
It is applicable after [PATCH SET] Make the negcache
New patches are attached.
SSSD patch changes:
-I changed the behavior to only try
parsing with the new flag when it
previously failed as proposed by Sumit.
-Existence of the flag is now
checked in the GPO code, not
in util.h as Lukas suggested
-I do not use the flag in the GPO child
anymore
On (15/04/16 14:41), Michal Židek wrote:
>On 03/16/2016 02:04 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> these three patches add infrastructure for this libini feature
>> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/libini-config-file-checks
>>
>> I did not add the patch for ini_allowed_sections
On 05/02/2016 08:53 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 04/28/2016 01:41 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 04/26/2016 09:38 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hi list,
this simple patch fixes talloc hierarchy in initializing negative caches
in responders.
This patch is applicable after [1].
[1]
Hello,
this patch set moves negative cache from particular context of given
responder to common context resp_ctx.
It is reaction on Fix taloc context for negative cache [1]. And it
replaces it.
It is applicable after [PATCH SET] Make the negcache timeout part of
nc_ctx [2]
For clarity,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:47:50AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> Can you also extend sbus_request_invoke_or_finish() to treat
> ERR_SBUS_REQUEST_HANDLED the same way as EOK? I.e.
>
> case EOK:
> case ERR_SBUS_REQUEST_HANDLED:
> return;
>
> This way you don't have to translate the new error
On 05/05/2016 10:44 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 05/05/2016 10:39 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2928
It isn't related to this ticket :-)
and it does not solve it.
I will remove it before pushing the patch
CI passed
On (05/05/16 10:44), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 05/05/2016 10:39 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > Resolves:
>> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2928
>> It isn't related to this ticket :-)
>> and it does not solve it.
>>
>> I will remove it before pushing the patch
>>
>> CI passed
>>
On 05/05/2016 10:39 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2928
It isn't related to this ticket :-)
and it does not solve it.
I will remove it before pushing the patch
CI passed
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/42/85/summary.html
ACK
LS
Hi Lukas,
On (04/05/16 11:55), Petr Cech wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I noticed a small discrepancy, so I fixed it.
>There was duplication of mock function in our tests.
>
>Simple patch is attached.
>
>Regards
>
>--
>Petr^4 Čech
>From 1d678d30330d326c75b6b6ac5fe0d8b652804e0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Petr Cech
12 matches
Mail list logo
