Hi All,
We have ganesha NFS server that calls innetgr() call to validate
client request. Noticing that all ganesha threads were making innetgr()
calls and spending a lot of time there, I wrote a small script that just
repeatedly calls innetgr() with same host name but with two different
On 05/09/2016 01:15 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 05/05/2016 05:34 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hello,
this patch resolves [1]. This adds new behaviour of negative caching of
locals, so it needs new tests. I will send patch with tests soon, but
not today.
It is applicable after
RESPONDERS: Negcache in
On 05/06/2016 07:05 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (06/05/16 06:58), Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> On May 6, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>
On (05/05/16 10:46), Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Ubuntu systems use "unity" as their screen-locker. Without this in
Hi,
On 27.4.2016 12:19, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
please see the attached trivial patch. The issue was reported by adelton
on IRC.
LGTM.
Honza
--
Jan Cholasta
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On 05/05/2016 05:34 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
Hello,
this patch resolves [1]. This adds new behaviour of negative caching of
locals, so it needs new tests. I will send patch with tests soon, but
not today.
It is applicable after
RESPONDERS: Negcache in resp_ctx [2].
For clarity, there is branch
On (09/05/16 12:20), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 05/09/2016 10:01 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> On 05/09/2016 09:54 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > a trivial code-hygiene patch is attached.
>> >
>> >
>> > 0001-Make-sdap_process_group_send-static.patch
>> >
>> >
>> > From
On 05/09/2016 10:01 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 05/09/2016 09:54 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
a trivial code-hygiene patch is attached.
0001-Make-sdap_process_group_send-static.patch
From ac33446aaa78b65c6891f486e9ad462101f88a79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:36:57PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (27/04/16 10:51), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >the attached patches implement unit tests for the pam_sss module using
> >pam_wrapper and libpamtest. In my testing, the coverage is around 75%
> >with mostly the parts that
Hi,
the attached patches are the first self-contained part of my performance
work. Using them, I analyzed the performance of 'id' as the worst-case,
then realized most of the issues are around processing and storing large
groups. The results gathered using these scripts are in fact the base of
On 05/09/2016 09:54 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
a trivial code-hygiene patch is attached.
0001-Make-sdap_process_group_send-static.patch
From ac33446aaa78b65c6891f486e9ad462101f88a79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:10:27 +0100
Hi,
a trivial code-hygiene patch is attached.
>From ac33446aaa78b65c6891f486e9ad462101f88a79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:10:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Make sdap_process_group_send() static
---
src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_groups.c |
On 05/09/2016 09:32 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:21:53AM +0200, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
From what I've gathered, you would also like to have
it ported to FreeBSD and Solaris (correct me if I'm wrong). I already did
some research on how to get the Olson name there but it
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:21:53AM +0200, Stanislav Laznicka wrote:
> From what I've gathered, you would also like to have
> it ported to FreeBSD and Solaris (correct me if I'm wrong). I already did
> some research on how to get the Olson name there but it all seems a bit
> messy so if you know of
Hello,
So after quite some time I finally got some HBAC time rules code I am
able to present. I forked your sssd Github repository and added the code
in my branch, the forked repo can be found on the following link:
https://github.com/stlaz/sssd/tree/freeipa-timerules
Please note that if
14 matches
Mail list logo