On 08/03/2016 12:34 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Two nitpicks, see inline.
On 07/22/2016 02:34 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
+static errno_t add_to_missing_attrs (TALLOC_CTX * mem_ctx,
+ struct sysdb_attrs *attrs,
+ const char *ext_key,
I asked Lukas this but he wasn't positive, is the objectClasses different when
adding 'ldap_sudo_search_base' ? Or is it just location?
Eitherway, I think this is going to be a little more concise,
"When SSSD is configured and using the IPA provider, sudo is automatically
enabled. The sudo sea
On 08/10/2016 08:36 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/08/16 17:41), Michal Židek wrote:
Hi,
see the attached patch.
I modified the detection of duplicates when
extending the maps (sysdb_attr:ldap_attr).
When we try to add entry to the map
that already exists in the map, then
without this patc
On (10/08/16 17:41), Michal Židek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>see the attached patch.
>
>I modified the detection of duplicates when
>extending the maps (sysdb_attr:ldap_attr).
>
>When we try to add entry to the map
>that already exists in the map, then
>without this patch we will fail.
>
>With this patch, we o
Just looked at this now, didnt realize it was just two lines, changes look
good. ;)
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:46:46AM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Thorsten Scherf
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
On 08/09/2016 05:41 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:09:27PM -0400, Justin Stephenson wrote:
Hi Lukas,
I sent a response on July 6th but perhaps there was an issue with the
mailing list or some reason it did not go through.
Yes, we had issues with the mailing list back then
Hi,
see the attached patch.
I modified the detection of duplicates when
extending the maps (sysdb_attr:ldap_attr).
When we try to add entry to the map
that already exists in the map, then
without this patch we will fail.
With this patch, we only fail if the
newly added extension would redefine
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:35:39PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ACK
Thank you for the careful review. Pushed to master:
* 95de2cd9ea8083115f3bbbf0867aaf6b218cb624
* c777f575b0ec0c48ce3b85ea2c5cc298db02450e
* 79ac0e8a4840202c3615d6ce6584df3c08efb594
* d2902de03738a3018445698650d8
On (29/07/16 11:44), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (26/07/16 15:00), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>please see the attached patches. I'm not sure how this bug got in,
>>because in the patch that broke the functionality
>>(eef359b508b898ae99d2bf292a43f0f295a2ba5e) I said in the commit message
>>that I
On (10/08/16 09:07), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 08/10/2016 08:28 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
>> On 08/10/2016 08:15 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > On (10/08/16 08:11), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > > On (10/08/16 08:09), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > > > ehlo,
>> > > >
>> > > > yesterdat, I build a sssd in copr f
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 02:16:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > and does not apply anymore on current master
>
> ACK (CI pending).
>
> I did some performance tests with systemtap and the performance hit was
> there, but very sma
On 08/10/2016 11:35 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:02:18PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2016, Michal Židek wrote:
Summary for Alexander (in CC):
- Regarding processing GPOs on the client.
- If groupPolicyContainer in AD has attribute
gPCMachineExtensionNa
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 08:08:03AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 08/10/2016 07:30 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
> > On 08/09/2016 07:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > On (09/08/16 10:21), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 06:37:10PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > > > ehlo,
> > > > >
Hi Pavel,
Thank you for your thoughtful and weighted response.
Please see my comments below.
On 07/25/2016 11:56 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hi Nick,
when I joined SSSD I used to document everything, exactly the way you
do. But I was trained by Jakub not to do it and in time I started to see
benef
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:02:18PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016, Michal Židek wrote:
> > Summary for Alexander (in CC):
> > - Regarding processing GPOs on the client.
> > - If groupPolicyContainer in AD has attribute
> > gPCMachineExtensionNames that contains only whitespa
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 03:08:52PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 02:59:46PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (29/07/16 13:01), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:44:53AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >> On (26/07/16 15:00), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >>
On Tue, 09 Aug 2016, Michal Židek wrote:
Summary for Alexander (in CC):
- Regarding processing GPOs on the client.
- If groupPolicyContainer in AD has attribute
gPCMachineExtensionNames that contains only whitespaces, SSSD
fails to process GPOs and denies access to users
- if the gPCMachineExte
On (10/08/16 09:24), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 08/09/2016 07:09 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> attcheck patch is a python wrapper for
>> netgroup lookups in sssd.
>>
>> LS
>
>Hello Lukas,
>
>thank you for this patch. You helped me.
>
>CI passed:
>http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/51/24/su
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:25:20AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (10/08/16 09:13), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> ehlo,
> >>
> >> yet another oneliner.
> >> It reminds me that we should generate either schema or
> >> data for python tes
On (10/08/16 09:13), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> yet another oneliner.
>> It reminds me that we should generate either schema or
>> data for python test.
>
>LGTM. Although, I'm not sure what you mean by generating either schema
>o
On (10/08/16 09:13), Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> yet another oneliner.
>> It reminds me that we should generate either schema or
>> data for python test.
>
>LGTM. Although, I'm not sure what you mean by generating either schema
>o
On 08/09/2016 07:09 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
attcheck patch is a python wrapper for
netgroup lookups in sssd.
LS
Hello Lukas,
thank you for this patch. You helped me.
CI passed:
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/51/24/summary.html
I found one nitpick, comment is in code bellow.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> yet another oneliner.
> It reminds me that we should generate either schema or
> data for python test.
LGTM. Although, I'm not sure what you mean by generating either schema
or data for python tests.
>
> LS
>
> _
On 08/10/2016 08:28 AM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/10/2016 08:15 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/08/16 08:11), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/08/16 08:09), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
yesterdat, I build a sssd in copr for various distributions
and the dyndns-tests failed for me few time.
We had
24 matches
Mail list logo