[SSSD] [PATCH] BUILD: Break the intgcheck target into 5 smaller targets: intgcheck-{prepare,configure,build,run,clean}

2016-08-18 Thread Fabiano Fidêncio
This patch is a first attempt to make "make intgcheck" less painful/time consuming than it is now. Although the patch provides a good improvement on having 5 new targets, I know it's still not ideal. The ideal case, IMO, would be being able to select which subset of tests would be run, but that's

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-18 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (18/08/16 11:37), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:12:44PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (09/08/16 19:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> >On (09/08/16 14:54), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >>On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-18 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (17/08/16 16:32), Petr Cech wrote: >On 08/17/2016 04:23 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: >> On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: >> > On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: >> > > > On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH SET] SYSDB: Adding message to inform about cache

2016-08-18 Thread Petr Cech
On 08/16/2016 02:32 PM, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 01:22 PM, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 01:02 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (16/08/16 12:52), Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 10:15 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:50:19AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: Hello list, I am

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Better error message if sssctl is ran w/o activating the IFP responder

2016-08-18 Thread Pavel Březina
On 08/17/2016 04:23 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote: Updated patch attached. Kind regards, Justin

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH SET] WIP: INTG: Tests for ldap nested netgroups

2016-08-18 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (17/08/16 14:32), Petr Cech wrote: >Hello list, > >there is attached patch set for intg. testing of ldap nested netgroups. > >I used last version of Lukas patch 'sssd_netgroup.py: Resolve nested >netgroups'. I don't know if it is on list. > >It is still WIP. It is in state that it is possible

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] sssd_netgroup.py: Resolve nested netgroups

2016-08-18 Thread Petr Cech
On 08/18/2016 12:19 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: ehlo, python wrapper for retrieving netgroups was push to early. Attached patch fixes it. LS Thanks, Lukas. I will take a look and I will try it with my tests :-) Reards -- Petr^4 Čech ___ sssd-devel

[SSSD] [PATCH] sssd_netgroup.py: Resolve nested netgroups

2016-08-18 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
ehlo, python wrapper for retrieving netgroups was push to early. Attached patch fixes it. LS >From 92b7a3adf688d68b37e2a545cdbe8405186859e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Slebodnik Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:05:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sssd_netgroup.py: Resolve nested

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH 2/2] sdap: Skip exact duplicates when extending maps

2016-08-18 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (18/08/16 11:41), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:37:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (17/08/16 15:39), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> >On (16/08/16 15:22), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> >>On (16/08/16 11:50), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> >>>On (12/08/16 16:30), Lukas Slebodnik

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH 2/2] sdap: Skip exact duplicates when extending maps

2016-08-18 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:37:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (17/08/16 15:39), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >On (16/08/16 15:22), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >>On (16/08/16 11:50), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >>>On (12/08/16 16:30), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (12/08/16 16:14), Jakub Hrozek

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] intg: test nested membership

2016-08-18 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:12:44PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (09/08/16 19:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >On (09/08/16 14:54), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >>On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >>>

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Added more meaningful error message when the IFP responder is disabled.

2016-08-18 Thread Thorsten Scherf
On [Thu, 18.08.2016 10:38], Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: Thorsten, Justin has already submitted a patch and it got ACKed a few days ago after some discussions about the error message. I guess it will be pushed soon. Great. I did not see it. Please ignore this patch submission then.

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Added more meaningful error message when the IFP responder is disabled.

2016-08-18 Thread Fabiano Fidêncio
Thorsten, Justin has already submitted a patch and it got ACKed a few days ago after some discussions about the error message. I guess it will be pushed soon. On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Thorsten Scherf wrote: > > > ___ >

[SSSD] [PATCH] Added more meaningful error message when the IFP responder is disabled.

2016-08-18 Thread Thorsten Scherf
>From 96342b64c7da0f7d8bf723ea57c6b8f646b13536 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thorsten Scherf Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:18:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Added more meaningful error message when the IFP responder is disabled. https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130 ---