This patch is a first attempt to make "make intgcheck" less
painful/time consuming than it is now.
Although the patch provides a good improvement on having 5 new
targets, I know it's still not ideal. The ideal case, IMO, would be
being able to select which subset of tests would be run, but that's
On (18/08/16 11:37), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:12:44PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (09/08/16 19:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >On (09/08/16 14:54), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >>On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at
On (17/08/16 16:32), Petr Cech wrote:
>On 08/17/2016 04:23 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote:
>> On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> > On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
>> > > > On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin
On 08/16/2016 02:32 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/16/2016 01:22 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/16/2016 01:02 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (16/08/16 12:52), Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/16/2016 10:15 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:50:19AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
Hello list,
I am
On 08/17/2016 04:23 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote:
On 08/17/2016 04:26 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/16/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
On 08/16/2016 04:06 PM, Justin Stephenson wrote:
Updated patch attached.
Kind regards,
Justin
On (17/08/16 14:32), Petr Cech wrote:
>Hello list,
>
>there is attached patch set for intg. testing of ldap nested netgroups.
>
>I used last version of Lukas patch 'sssd_netgroup.py: Resolve nested
>netgroups'. I don't know if it is on list.
>
>It is still WIP. It is in state that it is possible
On 08/18/2016 12:19 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
python wrapper for retrieving netgroups was push to early.
Attached patch fixes it.
LS
Thanks, Lukas. I will take a look
and I will try it with my tests :-)
Reards
--
Petr^4 Čech
___
sssd-devel
ehlo,
python wrapper for retrieving netgroups was push to early.
Attached patch fixes it.
LS
>From 92b7a3adf688d68b37e2a545cdbe8405186859e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:05:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sssd_netgroup.py: Resolve nested
On (18/08/16 11:41), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:37:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (17/08/16 15:39), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >On (16/08/16 15:22), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >>On (16/08/16 11:50), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >>>On (12/08/16 16:30), Lukas Slebodnik
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 04:37:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (17/08/16 15:39), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (16/08/16 15:22), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>On (16/08/16 11:50), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>On (12/08/16 16:30), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (12/08/16 16:14), Jakub Hrozek
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:12:44PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (09/08/16 19:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (09/08/16 14:54), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>
On [Thu, 18.08.2016 10:38], Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
Thorsten,
Justin has already submitted a patch and it got ACKed a few days ago
after some discussions about the error message.
I guess it will be pushed soon.
Great. I did not see it. Please ignore this patch submission then.
Thorsten,
Justin has already submitted a patch and it got ACKed a few days ago
after some discussions about the error message.
I guess it will be pushed soon.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Thorsten Scherf wrote:
>
>
> ___
>
>From 96342b64c7da0f7d8bf723ea57c6b8f646b13536 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thorsten Scherf
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:18:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Added more meaningful error message when the IFP responder is
disabled.
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
14 matches
Mail list logo