[SSSD] [sssd PR#11] SECRETS: Don't remove a container when it has children (synchronize)

2016-09-08 Thread fidencio
fidencio's pull request #11: "SECRETS: Don't remove a container when it has children" was synchronize See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/11 ... or pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/11/head:pr11 git

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Create pidfile after responders have started

2016-09-08 Thread Victor Tapia
El 08/09/16 a las 13:13, Lukas Slebodnik escribió: > On (08/09/16 12:29), Victor Tapia wrote: >> El 01/09/16 a las 14:50, Lukas Slebodnik escribió: >>> On (26/08/16 13:16), Victor Tapia wrote: Hi, Sorry for the late response, I've been out for nearly two weeks. I'm attaching a

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Create pidfile after responders have started

2016-09-08 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (08/09/16 12:29), Victor Tapia wrote: >El 01/09/16 a las 14:50, Lukas Slebodnik escribió: >> On (26/08/16 13:16), Victor Tapia wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Sorry for the late response, I've been out for nearly two weeks. I'm >>> attaching a new version of the patch to review. >>> Does

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH SET] SYSDB: Adding message to inform about cache

2016-09-08 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (07/09/16 09:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 08:45:18AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (05/09/16 16:07), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 03:32:48PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> >> On (05/09/16 15:24), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >> >On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Create pidfile after responders have started

2016-09-08 Thread Victor Tapia
El 01/09/16 a las 14:50, Lukas Slebodnik escribió: > On (26/08/16 13:16), Victor Tapia wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Sorry for the late response, I've been out for nearly two weeks. I'm >> attaching a new version of the patch to review. >> >>> Does upstart/init script need to be updated as well? >>> We have

[SSSD] [sssd PR#16] TOOLS: sss_groupshow did not work (comment)

2016-09-08 Thread lslebodn
lslebodn commented on a pull request """ Patchwork uses "Superseded" for such cases and not rejected """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/16#issuecomment-24545 ___ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] Re: [RFCv3] NSS tlog integration

2016-09-08 Thread Sumit Bose
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 02:57:15PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > On 08/29/2016 11:47 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: > > Finally you call sysdb_initgroups_with_views() to get the list of groups > > the user is a member of and compare them with the groups form the > > session_recording configuration.

[SSSD] Re: [RFCv3] NSS tlog integration

2016-09-08 Thread Sumit Bose
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:42:32PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > Hi Simo, > > On 08/29/2016 11:47 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: > > Then you do a normal user lookup but if there are groups configured in > > the session_recording section you always do a SSS_DP_INITGROUPS instead > > of a SSS_DP_USER

[SSSD] [sssd PR#21] IFP: expose user and group unique IDs through DBus (opened)

2016-09-08 Thread tequeter
tequeter's pull request #21: "IFP: expose user and group unique IDs through DBus" was opened PR body: """ This adds a uniqueID property on User and Group InfoPipe objects. It has a useful value on AD- and IPA-backed domains. For Active Directory, this is the GUID. """ See the full pull-request