fidencio's pull request #11: "SECRETS: Don't remove a container when it has
children" was synchronize
See the full pull-request at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/11
... or pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/11/head:pr11
git
El 08/09/16 a las 13:13, Lukas Slebodnik escribió:
> On (08/09/16 12:29), Victor Tapia wrote:
>> El 01/09/16 a las 14:50, Lukas Slebodnik escribió:
>>> On (26/08/16 13:16), Victor Tapia wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the late response, I've been out for nearly two weeks. I'm
attaching a
On (08/09/16 12:29), Victor Tapia wrote:
>El 01/09/16 a las 14:50, Lukas Slebodnik escribió:
>> On (26/08/16 13:16), Victor Tapia wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been out for nearly two weeks. I'm
>>> attaching a new version of the patch to review.
>>>
Does
On (07/09/16 09:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 08:45:18AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (05/09/16 16:07), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 03:32:48PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (05/09/16 15:24), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >> >On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at
El 01/09/16 a las 14:50, Lukas Slebodnik escribió:
> On (26/08/16 13:16), Victor Tapia wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for the late response, I've been out for nearly two weeks. I'm
>> attaching a new version of the patch to review.
>>
>>> Does upstart/init script need to be updated as well?
>>> We have
lslebodn commented on a pull request
"""
Patchwork uses "Superseded" for such cases and not rejected
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/16#issuecomment-24545
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 02:57:15PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 08/29/2016 11:47 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Finally you call sysdb_initgroups_with_views() to get the list of groups
> > the user is a member of and compare them with the groups form the
> > session_recording configuration.
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:42:32PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Hi Simo,
>
> On 08/29/2016 11:47 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Then you do a normal user lookup but if there are groups configured in
> > the session_recording section you always do a SSS_DP_INITGROUPS instead
> > of a SSS_DP_USER
tequeter's pull request #21: "IFP: expose user and group unique IDs through
DBus" was opened
PR body:
"""
This adds a uniqueID property on User and Group InfoPipe objects. It has a
useful value on AD- and IPA-backed domains. For Active Directory, this is the
GUID.
"""
See the full pull-request