URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/106
Title: #106: Add a new "files" provider
jhrozek commented:
"""
I hope you noticed the earlier comment that says "I just set the Changes
Requested label so that it's clear to reviewers new patch set is coming up.."
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/106
Title: #106: Add a new "files" provider
lslebodn commented:
"""
I hope you noticed that this PR need to be rebased (due to refactoring of nss
responder)
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/106#issuecomment-268347295
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
fidencio commented:
"""
CI: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/59/63/summary.html
Rawhide failure is unrelated.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
Label: -Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
fidencio commented:
"""
Patch updated according to Simo's suggestion.
Removing the label "Changes requested" as it's done for review.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107
Author: fidencio
Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
Action: synchronized
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/107/head:pr107
git checkout pr107
Hi Lukas,
Just wanted to confirm your patch works for me.
Kind regards,
Victor
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/89
Title: #89: nss: rewrite nss responder so it uses cache_req
spbnick commented:
"""
Another question is cache_req going to be used by PAM (if this question even
makes sense)?
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/89
Title: #89: nss: rewrite nss responder so it uses cache_req
spbnick commented:
"""
Not a review, but rather a question to @pbrezina: why do some "plugin"
functions receive both cache_req_data and cache_req, which also references
cache_req_data, at the
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/89
Title: #89: nss: rewrite nss responder so it uses cache_req
jhrozek commented:
"""
@pbrezina @lslebodn is there any more work needed on
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1126 or
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2320 ? Do we anticipate to work
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/109
Title: #109: SSSCTL: fix netgroup-show parsing
Label: -Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/112
Title: #112: FAILOVER: Improve port status log messages
jhrozek commented:
"""
ok to test
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/112#issuecomment-268183489
___
sssd-devel mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo