On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:25:58PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> Ok, patches are attached.
Sorry for the delay in reviewing.
ACK to both.
CI: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/36/73/summary.html
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahost
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 08:54:53PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:16:37PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > attached patch does not seem to suffer from these errors any more.
> >
> > Shall I ask user who reported the bug
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:44:47AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> Similar patch is already in fedora
> and was provided by systemd experts :-)
>
> LS
CI: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/36/72/summary.html
ACK
___
sssd-devel mailing list
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 05:28:25PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 04:44 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:59:10PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >>I guess some options would need to be configurable only globally, e.g. the
> >>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:59:10PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 03:29 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 01:18:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >>Hi everyone,
> >>
> >>I'm starting implementing tlog [1] configurat
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 01:18:16PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm starting implementing tlog [1] configuration interfaces and would like
> to know what you'd like to use best in SSSD.
>
> Among tlog parameters are:
>
> Path to the shell to start
> The text for th
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:16:37PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> attached patch does not seem to suffer from these errors any more.
>
> Shall I ask user who reported the bug If he is willing to test this new
> version of the patch? IIRC he needs more then a week for a testing to be
>
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 02:55:51PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (20/01/16 11:09), Pavel Březina wrote:
> >On 01/19/2016 02:20 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> >>On 01/19/2016 02:07 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>>On 01/19/2016 01:13 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 01/19/2016 12:28 PM, Pavel Březina w
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:47:53AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 11:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:08:48PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2849
> >>
> >>You can use Pavel's CI &qu
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:08:48PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2849
>
> You can use Pavel's CI "intg - test regr 2849" test which he posted to the
> list today.
> From c78ae1b550794548518a083870443b29fa5d12bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:18:32AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:01:35AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (19/01/16 21:28), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:32:02PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:01:35AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (19/01/16 21:28), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:32:02PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:09:39PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> > On (14/01/16 11:53)
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:32:02PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:09:39PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (14/01/16 11:53), Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >this simple patch aims to fix https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2925
> > >which is needed for older platfo
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 04:29:05PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> The patch silences the syslog message (thx Jakub for giving access
> testing machine).
> Code looks good to me.
>
> CI passed:
> http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/35/75/summary.html
>
> ACK.
* master: 95c132e1a8c6bbab4be8b3a340333
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:02:10PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 01/19/2016 01:38 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2904
> >
> >Unfortunately, I wasn't able to reproduce the issue and neither the
> >reporter can reproduce it anymore and we can't known exactly why we
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 04:55:54PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:15:01PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:48:40PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 01:53:27PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 02:13:14PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> I would like to appologize for confusion the latest patches
> works fine for local{user,group}
>
> There is only issue with hostmask but we do not pland to add support now.
>
> +1
> tested by: LS (I didn't read patches)
Thank you
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:15:01PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:48:40PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 01:53:27PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > Thank you for the review. New version attached.
> > >
> > > bye,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 06:38:33PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:30:29AM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> > On 01/06/2016 02:19 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >>On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 1
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:30:29AM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 01/06/2016 02:19 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:47:13AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>>On 01/05/2016 05:33 PM, Ja
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 01:53:27PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Thank you for the review. New version attached.
>
> bye,
> Sumit
Thank you, the patch now look good to me and seem to work well. I see
this message in adcli output:
! Couldn't set userAccountControl on computer account:
CN=ADCLIEN
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:03:30AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 01/15/2016 04:31 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (15/01/16 15:06), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 02:26:48PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>On (15/01/16 10:21), Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 01/14/2016 06:37 PM,
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:44:44AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > +renewal_data->ad_keytab = talloc_strdup(renewal_data,
> > +dp_opt_get_string(opts,
> > AD_KEYTAB));
Looks like the default ad provider configuration doesn't set the
AD_KEYTAB option
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:33:41AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (14/01/16 11:22), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (14/01/16 11:16), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:27:16PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>> On (12/01/16 10:38), Jakub Hrozek wrot
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:44:44AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 05:54:06PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch adds a task to the AD provider which calls adcli on a regular
> > basis to update the machine account password if needed. adcli supports
> > this fun
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:35:50PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:45:59AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:44:44AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 05:54:06PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > Hi,
&g
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:44:44AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 05:54:06PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch adds a task to the AD provider which calls adcli on a regular
> > basis to update the machine account password if needed. adcli supports
> > this fun
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:47:32AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:55:57PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> > On 01/11/2016 02:03 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > >On 01/11/2016 12:43 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >I believe the code belongs to
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:34:06AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:59:45AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > Just found this when working on other stuff...
>
> ACK (Waiting for CI before pushing..)
CI: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/35/55/summar
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:09:12PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > OK to push now?
>
> Yes please :-)
>
> Simo
* master: 19e44537c28f6d5f011cd7ac885c74c1e892605f
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:03:51AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 12:41 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:56:25PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > subj says it all,
> > > bug: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2924
> >
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:56:25PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> subj says it all,
> bug: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2924
>
> I have compiled and run make check|intgcheck but "not" actively tested
> this patch.
I did test the patch by crating an account in AD and then ticking the
"Account
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:59:45AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> Just found this when working on other stuff...
ACK (Waiting for CI before pushing..)
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:22:19PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (11/01/16 10:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:48:00PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> ehlo,
> >>
> >> This change is required to reduce dependency tree in clie
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:27:16PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (12/01/16 10:38), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:49:45AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (11/01/16 10:29), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 09:29:57A
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:55:57PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 01/11/2016 02:03 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >On 01/11/2016 12:43 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I believe the code belongs to sssm_krb5_auth_init.
>
> Right, it is working the same way. I moved DNS SRV Lookup adding into
> sssm_krb5_a
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:14:42AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the attached patch fixes a bug spotted by Lukas.
* master: c42bd764452ecda95b7d8d3ce027c70b4ad5982c
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:39:33PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> The following 2 patches change the connection setup code to be more
> flexible.
>
> They are the groundwork to add a new secrets[1] responder that uses a
> REST API over a unix socket and therefore requires a different protocol
> handle
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 01:44:24PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (12/01/16 13:36), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:17:54AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> This looks like a bug, when I install from source, the directory is
> >> owned by sssd.
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:17:54AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> This looks like a bug, when I install from source, the directory is
> owned by sssd.sssd.
>
> btw when I tested this, I think I found another issue -- we try to bump
> the mtime of /etc/krb5.conf, but since the file i
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:49:45AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (11/01/16 10:29), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 09:29:57AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> ehlo,
> >>
> >> patch should fix fedora bug 1266940
> >>
> &
p 17 00:00:00 2001
> >From: Sumit Bose
> >Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:51:09 +0100
> >Subject: [PATCH] ldap: remove originalMeberOf if there is no memberOf
> >
> Have you sent the correct patch ?
>
> LS
No :-) See the ones in attachment..
>From 7bdeb696c6e3f42624a3b
Hi,
the attached patch fixes a bug spotted by Lukas.
>From 0e2e48102aec5d7ffb15aeec23830e595bc91961 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 14:56:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] DP: Print warning when the handler is not configured
We would previously only print the gene
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (10/12/15 13:36), Petr Cech wrote:
> >On 12/10/2015 01:27 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>On (10/12/15 12:54), Petr Cech wrote:
> >>>On 11/23/2015 03:09 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:39:06AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 06:54:32PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch should solve https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2917 by
> > properly removing originalMemberOf if there is no m
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:58:59PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (11/01/16 14:19), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:07:22PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >> On 01/08/2016 06:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >On (10/12/15 10:59), Jakub Hroze
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:51:24PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (11/01/16 12:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:22:19PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (11/01/16 10:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:48:00P
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:09:48PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:03:33PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > Hello Sumit, thanks for comments and sorry for my delayed response, I'm
> > addressing the issues right now, in this mail I just want quickly discuss
> > the concern you
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:07:22PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 01/08/2016 06:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (10/12/15 10:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:10:58PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>On (04/12/15 16:42), Jakub Hrozek wro
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:22:19PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (11/01/16 10:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:48:00PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> ehlo,
> >>
> >> This change is required to reduce dependency tree in clie
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 06:54:32PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch should solve https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2917 by
> properly removing originalMemberOf if there is no memberOf in the
> original object anymore.
>
> bye,
> Sumit
ACK
good catch with the "+2" when allocating
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:13:22AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:36:33AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 05:07:28PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > On (08/01/16 16:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > >On Fri, Jan 08, 2
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:38:20AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:39:32AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > On 01/06/2016 05:41 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > >>https://fed
Hi,
with the help of Patrick from the Fedora Infra team, our github repo:
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
is now receiving automatic updates after patches are pushed to the
fedorahosted.org repo.
Since the push is implemented as a git hook which pushes with "--force
--mirror", you'll see a messa
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:36:33AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 05:07:28PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (08/01/16 16:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:16:51PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >> I thought a lit
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:39:32AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 01/06/2016 05:41 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2765
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >this patch is m
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 05:07:28PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (08/01/16 16:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:16:51PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> I thought a little bit and it might be better to move this
> >> directory into sssd-
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 09:29:57AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> patch should fix fedora bug 1266940
>
> LS
Thanks for the patch, but what other patches should I have in order to
apply?
Right now I have:
a055c02 SPEC: Move libsss_sudo.so outside sssd-common
18d722c SPEC: Change pack
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:48:00PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> This change is required to reduce dependency tree in client
> container (or on atomic host, ...)
>
> Patch is attached.
>
> LS
I have some questions..
1) Why not just move the file ownership to sssd-common? Are you
co
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:16:51PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/01/16 12:00), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (07/01/16 11:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:27:29AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>> On (06/01/16 18:21), Luka
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:27:29AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (06/01/16 18:21), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >ehlo,
> >
> >attached patch should fix warnings with ad provider
> >and without installed package sssd-ipa
> >
> >[sssd[be[domain.com]]] [sss_write_domain_mappings] (0x0200): Mapping fi
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:47:13AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > On 01/05/2016 05:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:12:51PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > >>On 12/14/2015 03:36
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2765
Hi,
this patch is mostly for cases where the non-site DCs are not reachanle
or too far, right?
The code looks OK to me, I'm running CI and Coverity now..
___
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 01/04/2016 03:36 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >when processing nested group memberships from multiple domains SSSD
> >might try to add a group to a wrong domain which will cause lookup
> >errors later because the group cannot
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (05/01/16 14:00), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I guess because I was lazy when writing the original patch the cached
> >entries for users and groups from trusted domains on IPA clients had a
> >hardcoded lifetime of 10h. With
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:12:51PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 03:36 PM, Petr Cech wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >there is patch for https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2791 attached.
> >
> >Result of patch:
> >
> >The message:
> >Dec 14 14:16:11 vm-058-166 sssd[be[uma.dev]]: dereference
an Lavu (1):
* Clarify that subdomains always use service discovery
Jakub Hrozek (7):
* Upgrading the version for the 1.13.3 release
* DP: Do not confuse static analysers with dead code
* BUILD: Only install polkit rules if the directory is available
* IPA: Use search timeout, not enum t
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:36:05AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 05:02:01PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (11/12/15 15:42), Petr Cech wrote:
> > >Hi Lukas,
> > >
> > >I addressed your comments, see attachment.
> > >
>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:17:54PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:08:27PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > I accidentally did not include the first patch, I'm sending it again, five
> > > patches now.
> > >
> >
> > Cod
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:50:14PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (03/09/15 10:00), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:21:28PM -0400, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >> CI passed: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/24/24/summary.html
> >>
> >>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:08:27PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > I accidentally did not include the first patch, I'm sending it again, five
> > patches now.
> >
>
> Code-wise ACK, CI is still running..
CI: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/34/59/summary.html (th
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:46:11AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 11:39 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >On 12/14/2015 10:43 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:46:38AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>>On 12/04/2015 03:51 PM, Jakub Hroz
Hi,
the release notes for 1.13.3 are ready at:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Releases/Notes-1.13.3
Please propose edits or just fix the page if something is incorrect or
missing..
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
ht
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:46:38AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 12/04/2015 03:51 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:45:55PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>On 12/03/2015 11:48 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:58:5
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 05:02:01PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (11/12/15 15:42), Petr Cech wrote:
> >Hi Lukas,
> >
> >I addressed your comments, see attachment.
> >
> >And I did a little investigation---if we use clang-format the ' \' on the end
> >of lines are really vanished. It is good ne
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 05:31:52PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 12:47 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >ehlo,
> >
> >I generated patch for master and 1.13 branch
> >
> >LS
>
> Hi Lukas,
>
> thank you for patches, both look good (to me).
> There are CI tests:
> http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/lo
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:55:04AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 12/04/2015 03:51 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>From 38c5524b82d94db68450636020472869dc362070 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>+if (ret != EOK) {
> >>+DEBUG(SSSDBG_CRIT_FAILURE, "Unable to setup full refresh ptask "
> >>+
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:19:27PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> From 45754d761d6b549e4055f8af38a1229ad2689527 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Petr Cech
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:13:59 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] KRB5_CHILD: Debug logs for PAC timeout
>
> This patch adds debug message that inform user
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:52:48PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> Thank you for review.
> I prefer one return point per function.
>
> Petr
>
> PS: New patch is attached.
ACK
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorah
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:39:42PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 11:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:25:06PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>simple patch is attached.
> >>
> >>Regards
> >&g
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:06:04PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:07:06PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > attached is a man page patch requested in
> > ticket https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2787
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:30:34PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch should suppress the
> > "sdap_idmap_domain_has_algorithmic_mapping] (0x0080): Could not parse
> > domai
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:07:06PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a man page patch requested in
> ticket https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2787
>
> Michal
> From 2098c7578e8a6834afed6c4e8086ccf6f5336c6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Michal=20=C5=BDidek?=
> Date
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:30:34PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch should suppress the
> "sdap_idmap_domain_has_algorithmic_mapping] (0x0080): Could not parse
> domain SID from [(null)] ]]]" which e.g. is regularly seen with the IPA
> provider when there is no trust support enabled o
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:38:32PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (09/12/15 14:30), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:32:08PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:41:16AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:25:06PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> Hi,
>
> simple patch is attached.
>
> Regards
>
> Petr
I think we should put the debug message into sss_send_pac() after we
actually succeeded in writing to the socket to avoid printing the
message for cases where the PAC responder is
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:57:02PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On 12/07/2015 03:43 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:33:51PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> >>So, I have choose the 2) option and the patch is attached.
> >
> >I think this patch goes in
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:10:58PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (04/12/15 16:42), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:24:54PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >> On 11/20/2015 12:04 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 01:51:5
Hi,
I would like to release 1.13.3 tarball no later than Tuesday Dec-15. There
is a number of tickets that were not closed and I'm wondering whether to
move them to 1.13.4 or 1.14 Alpha. So far I'm thinking that:
- anything our downstream requires should stay in 1.13.4
- the rest, that's m
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:23:38PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (09/12/15 13:11), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:51:50AM -0500, Dan Lavu wrote:
> >> Go for it, wasn't aware that non R2 is supported upstream.
> >
> >Unless anyone oppo
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:19:54PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (09/12/15 14:29), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:15:32PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (09/12/15 14:11), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >On (09/12/15 13:21), Sumit Bose wrot
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:32:08PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:41:16AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:48:29AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > > Attached.
> > >
> >
> > > From 845fa8d3cf904f4d237527f
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:15:32PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (09/12/15 14:11), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (09/12/15 13:21), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 12:24:38PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:07:10PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2813
>
> I wanted to split include/debug_levels.xml into more files so we don't
> duplicate information, but I didn't figure out how to use xi:include in
> files that are already beeing included.
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:51:50AM -0500, Dan Lavu wrote:
> Go for it, wasn't aware that non R2 is supported upstream.
Unless anyone opposes, I will push the attached patch with Dan's
authorship and my RB later today.
>From 39fd2dbcc82701d56d6ee9aebf032199a525880a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: D
Cleanup of 1.13.3 easy tickets before upstream release..
>From 19e0bdabb9699130cf99d9192f6ab06fa0f6f923 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 13:03:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] MAN: Clarify when should TGs be disabled for group nesting
restriction
Resolves:
ht
Hi,
see the attached trivial patch. It was verified by a user on IRC that
decreasing the timeout helped quite a bit when a laptop with AD user
went offline and the AD user tried to unlock the screen.
>From 1e85e3bff55f9dc686a74ffd99ff44cf063fcf29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
D
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:20:52AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/12/15 15:51), Petr Cech wrote:
> >Hi Lukas,
> >
> >thank you for review. I will send new version of tests, in one patch. And I
> >will address your comments.
> >
> >However I would like to shed light on why I made the changes
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:36:19AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 21:00 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was looking at options we have for setting up an automated way to
> > mirror our fedorahosted.org repo to github.com. Unfortuna
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:11:33PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> Nice :-(.
>
> Thanks for noticing. Shall we return to the first iteration of the patch?
Do you know why this happens and why would the first iteration be
better? I don't see from the code what's wrong..
__
901 - 1000 of 8321 matches
Mail list logo
