On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 14:46 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:23:54AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 14:08 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > With this patch we correctly parse groups.
> > > A 2 pass approach for setting members assures even complicated
> nested
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:23:54AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 14:08 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > With this patch we correctly parse groups.
> > A 2 pass approach for setting members assures even complicated nested
> > groups do not risk to miss memberships
>
> Rebased on top
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 09:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 14:08 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > With this patch we correctly parse groups.
> > A 2 pass approach for setting members assures even complicated nested
> > groups do not risk to miss memberships
>
> Rebased patch on top o
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 14:08 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> With this patch we correctly parse groups.
> A 2 pass approach for setting members assures even complicated nested
> groups do not risk to miss memberships
Rebased on top of Sumit patch that stores the DN
Also fixed an error in a debug messag
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 14:08 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> With this patch we correctly parse groups.
> A 2 pass approach for setting members assures even complicated nested
> groups do not risk to miss memberships
Rebased patch on top of master.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
>From
With this patch we correctly parse groups.
A 2 pass approach for setting members assures even complicated nested
groups do not risk to miss memberships
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
>From 22abda63e1e1c58b745a3a79d68e96fc1bb39e0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simo Sorce
Date: Sa
