On 09/01/2015 10:05 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:26:06PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/10/2015 03:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the by-certificate
lookups. One was that if parsing the reply with client UID failed,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:26:06PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 03:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the by-certificate
> >lookups. One was that if parsing the reply with client UID failed, then
> >errno would have been
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:37:16AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 10:05 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:26:06PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>On 08/10/2015 03:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the
Hi,
I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the by-certificate
lookups. One was that if parsing the reply with client UID failed, then
errno would have been garbage.
The second is that since we added signal handling, we always receive
NameOwnerChanged after someone binds to the bus.