Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Two sbus fixes

2015-09-01 Thread Pavel Březina
On 09/01/2015 10:05 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:26:06PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: On 08/10/2015 03:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: Hi, I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the by-certificate lookups. One was that if parsing the reply with client UID failed,

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Two sbus fixes

2015-09-01 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:26:06PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 08/10/2015 03:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the by-certificate > >lookups. One was that if parsing the reply with client UID failed, then > >errno would have been

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Two sbus fixes

2015-09-01 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:37:16AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 09/01/2015 10:05 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:26:06PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: > >>On 08/10/2015 03:31 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the

[SSSD] [PATCH] Two sbus fixes

2015-08-10 Thread Jakub Hrozek
Hi, I found two issues in the sbus code while testing the by-certificate lookups. One was that if parsing the reply with client UID failed, then errno would have been garbage. The second is that since we added signal handling, we always receive NameOwnerChanged after someone binds to the bus.