-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2009 12:56 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 09/30/2009 05:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Yes, it is. I didn't want to repeat my previous mistake and push this
>> without a second pair of eyes.
>
> The patch looks fine, updates only .po files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2009 05:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Yes, it is. I didn't want to repeat my previous mistake and push this
> without a second pair of eyes.
The patch looks fine, updates only .po files -- I don't think it's
necessary to update anything e
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 11:15 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Yes, it is. I didn't want to repeat my previous mistake and push this
> without a second pair of eyes.
>
> On Sep 30, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 10:11 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Sent on
Yes, it is. I didn't want to repeat my previous mistake and push this
without a second pair of eyes.
On Sep 30, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 10:11 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Sent on behalf of Piotr Drąg
>
> Is this waiting an ack ?
>
> Simo.
>
> __
On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 10:11 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Sent on behalf of Piotr Drąg
Is this waiting an ack ?
Simo.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Sent on behalf of Piotr Drąg
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
From 2f78a6575de956e8de3c5e1dbd411e5b33e5a349 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Piotr=20Dr=C4=85g?=
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:09:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] U
