Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] remove "legacy" option

2009-08-27 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 09:55 -0400, Jenny Galipeau wrote: > Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:33 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:58:41AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > >> > >>> The "legacy" option was introduced to speed up development. > >>> It is actua

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] remove "legacy" option

2009-08-27 Thread Jenny Galipeau
Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:33 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:58:41AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: >> >>> The "legacy" option was introduced to speed up development. >>> It is actually confusing and not necessary. >>> >From now on we store all using th

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] remove "legacy" option

2009-08-27 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:33 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:58:41AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > The "legacy" option was introduced to speed up development. > > It is actually confusing and not necessary. > > >From now on we store all using the member/memberof schema > interna

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] remove "legacy" option

2009-08-27 Thread Sumit Bose
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:58:41AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > The "legacy" option was introduced to speed up development. > It is actually confusing and not necessary. > >From now on we store all using the member/memberof schema internally. > (Tested only with the native ldap driver). > > 0001 mai

[SSSD] [PATCHES] remove "legacy" option

2009-08-26 Thread Simo Sorce
The "legacy" option was introduced to speed up development. It is actually confusing and not necessary. >From now on we store all using the member/memberof schema internally. (Tested only with the native ldap driver). 0001 mainly converts the core sysdb functions 0002 fixes many errors in fill_gre