URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
lslebodn commented:
"""
cigarette
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-351685924
___
sssd-devel mailing list --
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
lslebodn commented:
"""
cigarette
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-351685924
___
sssd-devel mailing list --
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
Well, when a PR is not reviewed and the comments come with:
"Coding style was never a priority and I cannot see a reason why
core developer need to sped a time with fixing coding style issues
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (14/12/17 10:08), fidencio wrote:
>As per @lslebodn's comments I understand that SSSD project has **no** interest
>on this PR at the moment.
>
Please do not put words to my mouth. I have
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
tiran commented:
"""
As a software developer with over 20 years of coding experience and involved in
lots of Open Source projects written in C, Go and Python, I have to disagree
with you. A consistent code style and
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
As per @lslebodn's comments I understand that SSSD project has **no** interest
on this PR at the moment.
I've opened https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3605 and I'm closing this PR.
"""
See
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (14/12/17 08:47), fidencio wrote:
>We **really** have to have a better way to handle PRs as it's not the first
>time it happens ...
>
pep8 is only about coding style it does not make code
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
Hmm. And seems that I will have to re-work these patches as more new issues
have been added meanwhile this patch was stuck. :-/
We **really** have to have a better way to handle PRs as it's
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
I have updated the patch set and fired a CI build.
I'd really appreciate if we can have this one pushed as soon as our internal CI
passes and then avoid having to fix pep8 issues in the
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
Man, that you have some serious problems with language is quite clear ... but,
unfortunately, seems you also have some really serious problems with reading.
Let me copy a comment made a few
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
lslebodn commented:
"""
We do not have a tracking ticket for enforcing pep8 check therefore I cannot
set ticket https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3463 as a blocker for enforcing
pep8. Therefore label "Changes
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
lslebodn commented:
"""
Reverting "intg: Disable add_remove tests" and adding it back is not nice.
Much better would be to fix https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3463 and it would
be much better spent time of core
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
CI: http://vm-058-233.${abc}/logs/job/77/70/summary.html
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-330652762
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
I have updated the patch set.
This new version has the each issue fixed explained and also the ones found
just on this or that distro also explained where they were found.
CI is already
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
@lslebodn, @jhrozek: I'll follow a different approach in case you guys are
fine. Basically what I'm going to do is combine all the ignored by default
warnings in all our supported systems
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
CI: http://vm-058-233.${abc}/logs/job/77/61/summary.html
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-330502831
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
I have provided a workaround for the issues pointed out in one of my comments.
That may be a way to go ...
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
jhrozek commented:
"""
cc @tiran
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-329418574
___
sssd-devel mailing list --
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
jhrozek commented:
"""
I suspect Debian uses a different Python version that carries a different pep8
check. I wonder if any of the Python developers from the IPA team can help us.
Can you check with them?
"""
See
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
Okay. I still have some issues with debian and those I'm not exactly sure how
to solve, thus I'd appreciate if I can get some help from someone who's either
a little bit more familiar with
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
Seems that I broke one of the integration tests and there are more issues on
debian.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-329378299
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
retest this, please
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-329287584
___
sssd-devel mailing list --
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
lslebodn commented:
"""
Thank you very for writing this test. Boring checks is better to automatize :-)
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-329096965
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
On Wednesday, September 13, 2017, lslebodn wrote:
> *@lslebodn* commented on this pull request.
> --
>
> In contrib/ci/run
>
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Jakub Hrozek
wrote:
> Well, yeah, all our python code should conform to pep8. I sent a PR some
> time ago that tried to reformat
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
jhrozek commented:
"""
Well, yeah, all our python code should conform to pep8. I sent a PR some time
ago that tried to reformat the tests but I don't have any time to rework it or
check for other issues in other
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
It's not going to work, @jhrozek. We have .py files in a few different places
than in our tests and those will have to be fixed as well in case this PR is
desired.
Another option would be to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
jhrozek commented:
"""
Well, I applied the patch on top of the old pep8 PR and submitted to CI, let's
see what results we get.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
jhrozek commented:
"""
(Then it would make sense to resubmit both in the same PR)
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-328801865
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379
Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check
fidencio commented:
"""
Btw, CI obviously fails due to the pip8 check.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-328295582
___
30 matches
Mail list logo