URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/442
Title: #442: LDAP: Improve error treatment from sdap_cli_connect() in ldap_auth
lslebodn commented:
"""
master:
* 20d18db36096e3fa2636143a83a12a2e3a7f26d6
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/442#issuecomment-343581840
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/442
Title: #442: LDAP: Improve error treatment from sdap_cli_connect() in ldap_auth
lslebodn commented:
"""
There were some random failures which I did not see before. But it worked well
after re-executing problematic jobs 5 times. I hope it was not
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/442
Title: #442: LDAP: Improve error treatment from sdap_cli_connect() in ldap_auth
sumit-bose commented:
"""
@lslebodn, thanks, shall I set the Accepted flag or will you do it?
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/442
Title: #442: LDAP: Improve error treatment from sdap_cli_connect() in ldap_auth
lslebodn commented:
"""
@sumit-bose I'm waiting for results of tests.
I'll push the patch after good results with your ACK
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/442
Title: #442: LDAP: Improve error treatment from sdap_cli_connect() in ldap_auth
sumit-bose commented:
"""
The patch makes sense and passes the CI (with the current exception on F27 and
rawhide caused by the newer libldb). ACK
@fidencio, please let me
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/442
Title: #442: LDAP: Improve error treatment from sdap_cli_connect() in ldap_auth
fidencio commented:
"""
I've ran two downstream tests and both passed successfully:
- 2131430 (the one that found this regression)
- 2131429 (the one recommended by Jakub
