URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519
Title: #519: DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists
jhrozek commented:
"""
I fixed a trivial const warning in the code and pushed the patch to master:
e32e17d04c796b37bc3f4cde58106d54ffa2b6d1
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519
Title: #519: DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists
jhrozek commented:
"""
ACK, CI http://vm-031.${ABC}/logs/job/86/34/summary.html
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519#issuecomment-372449692
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519
Title: #519: DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists
justin-stephenson commented:
"""
PR updated with changes suggested, please review.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519#issuecomment-368991183
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519
Title: #519: DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists
jhrozek commented:
"""
btw for debugging purposes I wonder if it was also a good idea to read and
print the lists in `sssm_simple_access_init`. I think confdb already contains
the
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519
Title: #519: DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists
pbrezina commented:
"""
I think using highest debug level `SSSDBG_TRACE_ALL` would be better so we do
not swamp the logs with information easily obtainable from a configuration
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519
Title: #519: DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519#issuecomment-366542761
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519
Title: #519: DEBUG: Print simple access provider allow and deny lists
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/519#issuecomment-366542762
