[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-09-20 Thread pbrezina
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf pbrezina commented: """ * `sssd-1-16` * e48cdfb69b43964d5472bdf011af59343c719a06 - TESTS: adapt tests to enabled default files domain * 5b571efa60f8ce86089772fdd43555174692d0d2 - CONFDB:

[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-08-14 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf jhrozek commented: """ retest this please """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824#issuecomment-521162256 ___ sssd-devel

[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-08-08 Thread thalman
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf thalman commented: """ @jhrozek rebased/pushed. Still some CI tests fail. IMO errors are not connected with PR. """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-08-07 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf jhrozek commented: """ retest this please """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824#issuecomment-519099537 ___ sssd-devel

[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-08-06 Thread thalman
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf thalman commented: """ @jhrozek re-pushed """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824#issuecomment-518590416 ___ sssd-devel

[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-07-22 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf jhrozek commented: """ @thalman can you re-push the PR so that the internal CI also gets triggered? """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824#issuecomment-513903766

[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-07-22 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf jhrozek commented: """ @alexey-tikhonov do you also plan on reviewing this PR? """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824#issuecomment-513903655

[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-07-16 Thread thalman
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf thalman commented: """ Test passed on my VM ```[thalman@client sssd]$ ./contrib/ci/run -m install-deps: success 00:00:01 ci-install-deps.log pep8: success

[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-07-15 Thread thalman
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf thalman commented: """ > Patch set looks strange... Yes, some cherry pick mistake I did. Fixed now. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824#issuecomment-511353741

[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-07-15 Thread thalman
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf thalman commented: """ > Patch set looks strange... Yes, some cherry pick mistake I did. Fixed now. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824#issuecomment-511353741

[SSSD] [sssd PR#824][comment] CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf

2019-07-15 Thread alexey-tikhonov
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824 Title: #824: CONFDB: Files domain if activated without .conf alexey-tikhonov commented: """ Patch set looks strange... """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/824#issuecomment-511336736