[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-04-19 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:45:33PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >One solution can be to send SIGKILL to child process as part of cleanup > >in test_run_as_root_daemon. But that's not related to this patch :-) > > > Jakub, > > do we want to fix the confusing failure? Sure, if you know how to

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-04-19 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (31/03/16 09:46), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >On (18/03/16 17:53), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>On (17/03/16 23:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>>On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:12:00PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: ehlo, simple patch is attached. LS >>> >>>Garbage-collecting easy

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-04-19 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (07/04/16 10:11), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >On (06/04/16 17:47), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:10:02PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:17:00PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>> > On (31/03/16 09:46), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>> > >On (18/03/16 17:53),

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-04-07 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (06/04/16 17:47), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:10:02PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:17:00PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> > On (31/03/16 09:46), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> > >On (18/03/16 17:53), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> > >>On (17/03/16 23:17),

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-04-06 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:10:02PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:17:00PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > On (31/03/16 09:46), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > >On (18/03/16 17:53), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > >>On (17/03/16 23:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > > >>>On Mon, Mar 07,

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-04-06 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:17:00PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (31/03/16 09:46), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >On (18/03/16 17:53), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >>On (17/03/16 23:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >>>On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:12:00PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > ehlo, > >

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-04-01 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (31/03/16 09:46), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >On (18/03/16 17:53), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>On (17/03/16 23:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>>On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:12:00PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: ehlo, simple patch is attached. LS >>> >>>Garbage-collecting easy

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-03-31 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (18/03/16 17:53), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >On (17/03/16 23:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:12:00PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>> ehlo, >>> >>> simple patch is attached. >>> >>> LS >> >>Garbage-collecting easy patches untouched for a week or more.. >> >>The patch looks

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-03-19 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (17/03/16 23:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:12:00PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> ehlo, >> >> simple patch is attached. >> >> LS > >Garbage-collecting easy patches untouched for a week or more.. > >The patch looks good and according to: > >

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-03-19 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:12:00PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > ehlo, > > simple patch is attached. > > LS Garbage-collecting easy patches untouched for a week or more.. The patch looks good and according to: